Category: Gospel Leadership

January 31 2024

Return to The Word

A. Scott Ingram Bible Study, Christian Life, Gospel Leadership, Personal Discipleship, Spiritual Disciplines Bible, Bible Study, Jesus, Scripture, Word of God 0

One of the most significant calls on my life as an apostolic leader in a small corner of the church is not to lead leaders or plant churches. It is to make disciples.

I love discipleship. I love helping believers in Jesus learn to “grow up” in Him (Ephesians 4:15). After all, the goal of discipleship is to become like Him in the maturity of our faith and through a transformed life.

The problem with discipleship is that it is often a slow process and never a straight line from lost sinner to mature saint. There are, of course, significant leaps forward that people take. There are also seasons of baby steps and seasons of stumbling backward.

A true disciple-maker knows that although some seasons may be discouraging, the fruit of following the Holy Spirit and helping someone grow in Christ is a delight and will come with eternal rewards.

However, the challenge for us in 2024 is that with modern information technology, including instant access to everything on our smartphones and the immediate and effortless knowledge base provided by AI technology, it has become increasingly tedious to walk someone slowly and patiently through personal transformation.

We live in an age where a few moments of digital exploration can deliver almost anything humanity has ever known to us. While this is majorly beneficial in many aspects of life, it also increases our temptation of Christians to fall into the Renaissance-era foundations of modernity, believing that knowledge of truth alone is the goal. This is modern-day Christian Gnosticism.

We have thousands of self-proclaimed theologians who never even crack open the Bible because they, instead, have read every book and received endless teachings about the Bible, and they believe that is enough.

In the same way, we have self-proclaimed Christians who have learned so much about Jesus – through TikTok preachers and social media memes – yet they do not know Jesus! They never pray. They never wait on Him in the presence of the Holy Spirit. They know all about Jesus but don’t have time to slow down and get to know Him personally.

That is not, and cannot, be considered discipleship!

Jesus gave a two-part mandate to some of the early Jewish believers who followed Him in John 8:31-32:

“So Jesus said to the Jews who had believed him, ‘If you abide in my word, you are truly my disciples, and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.'”

The first part of this mandate is: “If you abide in my word, you are truly my disciples.”

The Greek word here is “logos,” which can mean either “word” or “message.” Jesus was telling these Jewish believers that to be His disciples, they not only had to know the scriptures but also conform their thinking and faith to His understanding of the scriptures.

Jesus was a Rabbi in the Jewish culture. Being a disciple of any particular Rabbi meant that you would live with them, learn from them directly, observe their walk of life, and conform your own lifestyle according to that Rabbi’s interpretation of the scriptures.

Notice that Jesus doesn’t tell them they must “know my word.” He said you must “abide” in it. This distinction gives us clarity on how the mandate is to be received.

The Greek word for “abide” is “menō,” which means “remain, stay, reside,” and, in some uses, is translated as “wait.” When Jesus says His disciples must “abide” in His word, it implies we must intentionally and continually live in His word and live out His word.

Jesus was not offering an instant transfer of His message from the Bible to their brains before moving on to something else. We are not transformed by what we know. We are transformed by what we continually and diligently focus on and meditate on. (Romans 12:2)

This leads to the second part of Jesus’ mandate: “and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”

At a surface level, this seems to imply that our freedom in Christ comes from our knowledge of the truth. Therefore, we could assume, as do many in our culture, that the more truth you know, the freer you should be. The problem is that a mental understanding of the truth of God’s word has never actually set anyone free from the power of sin, death, and the devil. Just ask the Jewish people!

The nation of Israel had the sole revelation of God’s word in the Old Testament, which God had revealed over thousands of years through Moses and the prophets. They built their whole culture around these scriptures, and their scholars knew every “jot and tittle” of the law. Yet transformation into God’s righteousness never came to the nation, nor the individual Jewish people.

Paul makes this case repeatedly in the book of Romans when He speaks of “the law,” which refers to the Teachings of Moses in the first five books of the Bible:

“For by works of the law no human being will be justified in his sight, since through the law comes knowledge of sin. (Romans 3:20)

Paul is saying that no knowledge of the law cannot transform you. All it can do is show you how deeply lost you are by revealing your sinfulness.

So what’s the point?

Jesus says if you will abide in My word, or “My understanding and teaching of the word,” then you are “My disciple.” But when you do that, He says that something else will happen that has never happened to any other disciple of any other Rabbi. Others only taught “knowledge” of the scriptures and a legalistic dedication to self-discipline. Jesus said that when you abide in “My word,” you will know the truth, and this truth will actually set you free from sin’s power and to live righteously before God.

So what makes this different?

Without spending too much time explaining the Greek language here, let me give you my summary of what Jesus says: “If you put your faith in My teaching, and you make it your goal to live continually in what I reveal to you, you will have an intimate experience with the only truth there is, and it will reshape your reality, setting you free.”

So, what ” truth ” would we encounter that sets us free? It is Jesus Himself!

“Jesus said to him, ‘I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.'” (John 14:6)

Jesus’ message regarding the purpose of the scriptures was always that they would point people to Himself.

In John 5, Jesus tells the religious leaders of Israel that although they think they know the scriptures, something is missing in how they approach them. They do not honestly know the God of the scriptures, nor does God’s word “abide” in them (transforming and saving them), because they ignore all the evidence that the scriptures point to Jesus directly! (John 5:37-40)

He tells these scholars, without mincing words, that their theological studies are fruitless to save them because they are not leading to faith or a transforming encounter with Him!

“You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear witness about me, yet you refuse to come to me that you may have life.” (John 5:30-40)

In contrast, whenever Jesus covertly approached the disciples on the road to Emmaus, after His resurrection, the Bible tells us that “beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he interpreted to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning himself” (Luke 24:27). When later recounting this event, though they didn’t recognize Him personally in that moment, they knew something deeper was going on than just hearing a sermon. Something inside them was being drawn to Him. “They said to each other, ‘Did not our hearts burn within us while he talked to us on the road, while he opened to us the Scriptures?'” (Luke 24:32)

For Scriptures to be rightly known, they must lead us to know Him!

So, what does all of this have to do with discipleship?

My point is that while you can gain all the possible knowledge there is about the scriptures — about God, about Jesus, about His saving grace, about the Holy Spirit — it will not be enough to make you a disciple of Christ, nor will it set you free from sin, death, and the devil.

You cannot just know about these things. You must abide deeply in the Word of God with faith, expecting it to lead you deeper in your relationship with Christ through the power of the Holy Spirit so that you can know the reality of the Gospel and be set free.

If you do not abide in the Word of God, being transformed by the power He provides, then you are not His disciple. You are not saved. You are not born again. You are not free. You are deceived, just like the Jewish leaders were for centuries.

We live in a world that believes information is power. The more you know, the more data you collect, the more information at your disposal, the more power you are believed to have. Yet Jesus says it is not information that matters. It is intimate, personal, relational knowledge of the Truth: Him.

We cannot be discipled by 90-second TikTok videos. We cannot grow in Christ through memes and algorithmic revelation. We reach maturity in Him daily – slowly and tediously – by studying His revelation in scripture and asking Him to enlighten our minds and hearts to come closer to Him. As we get close to Him, we will become like Him! (2 Corinthians 3:8) As we become like Him, we will be set free from the grip of sin, from the devil’s domination, and the fear of death, because we know that eternity with Him awaits.

If you want to be His disciple, get in His Word and let it bring you into an encounter with Him. Anything less is fruitless.

If you’re enjoying the content I produce, a little caffeine to keep me going would be appreciated!

Follow the Leader: The Biblical History of Elders

A. Scott Ingram Christian Life, Christian Life and Gospel Leadership, Gospel Leadership, Leadership Bible, Bible Study, elders, eldership, Gospel, history of eldership, Jesus, ministry leadership, Old Testament, Old Testament Survey, presbyteros, presbytery, Scripture 0

Part 2: The Biblical History of Elders

In Part 1, we looked at the biblical mandate which God has established whereby believers are called to “submit” (hypotassō) to various people (i.e. government leaders in Romans 13:1) and concepts (i.e. God’s righteousness in Romans 10:3).

We also observed some other biblical guidelines for submission in which Christians may willingly yield (hypeikō) ourselves to certain people if their life and teaching are worth being followed.

The High Call of Mutual Submission

On a broader scale, I pointed out that within the Body of Christ, God has commanded all believers to live in “mutual submission” to one another (Ephesians 5:20-21). This does not require us to bow ourselves to every whim or desire of our fellow believers. Yet it frees us to observe one another’s manner of life, and work in unity, as the body of Christ, to encourage and build each other up into Him.

Needless to say, living in mutual submission places a big responsibility on each of us to come to the body of Christ with honor, respect, and humility. It is a call to recognize that we are all made of the same dirt, and therefore, we all live fully dependent on the grace of the Lord, no matter our perceived status in the body of Christ. Therefore, not only do I submit to the Holy Spirit in me, but I must recognize and submit to the Holy Spirit working through other members of the Body of Christ, too!

Mutual submission is a partnership of love!

Remember, we are a family, not a business or a social club.

As we saw before, within the “mutual submission” of the church, Jesus has also commanded us to submit to those who have faithfully preceded us in the faith (see 1 Corinthians 16:15–16). In terms of a family, we might say this is like following the example of our older brothers and sisters in the church. They may not be perfect, but they are still ahead of where we are in our own life and growth.

Let’s also note that every family also has fathers and mothers who lead in the home. In the same way, in addition to all of this talk of mutual submission in the church, there is still a seemingly higher level of leadership within the Church for which the Biblical writers hold special regard. This is when the Bible says we are called to submit to the appointed “elders” in the church (see Acts 14:23, 1 Peter 5:5).

Before I move forward, please let me preface this article by saying that this is NOT the view of church leadership which I was taught in my Baptist Bible college and denomination, nor is it the broadly held view of the charismatic/neo-pentecostal denomination I currently belong to. It is still a widely held and practiced form of church leadership in many other denominations, though, and I think its something we need to explore and restore in the broader body of Christ. Everything I am writing here has come through a deep study of these scriptures over the past few years. Just know that I am not writing to argue against any Christian tradition or group. I am writing to expound on what I have found the scriptures to teach, and welcome deeper conversations on the subject going forward.

WHO ARE THESE “ELDERS” IN THE BIBLE?

The Greek word for “elders” is the word πρεσβύτερος (presbyteros), transliterated “presbyters” in many English church settings.

As we said in the last post, this Greek word can simply mean someone who is elderly in age. However, whenever the Bible uses this word in conjunction with leadership in the church, it is not used to mean older or even more mature people in the church (though maturity is assumed). Rather, it means those who hold “seniority”¹ within the church.

Throughout the New Testament, we learn that these “elders” are a specific kind of leaders in the church who meet three criteria:

They have been appointed by God;
They meet the personal qualifications laid out for the oversight of the church, and
They are publicly recognized to an appointed leadership position by the local body of Christ.

The word “presbyteros” is used throughout the New Testament, almost synonymously with the word “episkopos” (ἐπίσκοπος), meaning “overseer.” (This is also where we get the modern word “bishop.”)

As the Assembly of God denomination has stated:

“After research, we conclude, because of the use of the word in the original Greek (Acts 20:17, 28; 1 Timothy 5:17; James 5:14, etc.), that the words “elder” or “eldership” refer to the office of pastor, bishop, or overseer.”²

These “elders” work in unity as a “council” to lead the church (see 1 Timothy 4:14). In fact, the word “elder” is never used in a singular sense when talking about the role of church leadership. It is always “the elders” or “an elder” of the church, not “the elder” of the church (see Titus 1:5, for example).

We will look specifically at the oversight role of elders and the requirements placed upon them in a future post, but first, I want us to do a little background study of this whole concept.

Where Did the Idea of “Eldership” Originate?

The use of the word “elders” in the New Testament to describe the institutional leadership in the local church or local assembly of God is an idea carried over from the Old Testament.³ The Jewish people recognized a group of leaders within their local and religious community who were appointed to lead their local congregations as well as govern more broadly in the nation.

Eldership First Developed in Families

The idea of eldership is established early in the Old Testament, and seems to naturally form through the growth of families into clans, then tribes, then nations. As R. Alastair Campbell wrote:

“Israelite society was tribal and patriarchal. The nation consisted of tribes, which themselves consisted of clans which in turn consisted of extended families, and each of these units and sub-units looked to the senior males among them for leadership.”⁴

From the beginning, God appointed the man to lead his wife; and the father and mother to lead their children and others who would become joined to the family (daughters-in-law, servants, etc.). This is where we first get the idea of a person’s household (first used in Genesis 7:1, and see Genesis 15:3).

To use a modern vernacular for our purposes, we might say that the man was to be the “Senior Elder” in the family, but he worked as a team with his co-equal, yet different “helper,” his wife, to lead the family. The father was the “senior elder,” but mom and dad together would be the “elders” of the family.

As children grew and produced grandchildren and great-grandchildren, they would then serve as the “elders” in their own immediate family. However, the living grandparents would still be viewed as the “patriarch” and “matriarch” of the extended family or clan. As the “senior elders” of the clan, these patriarchs would work with the parents in every home(especially the father) to lead the whole extended family together. This formed a kind of “council of elders” over the extended family (or extended household).

Even though a man and wife had the autonomy to lead their own family and household as they saw fit, they would join the other family ‘elders’ within their extended family (clan) to form the leadership (primitive government) of their “village.” Thus, civics was born.

As Campbell goes on to write:

“The head of the house made decisions within his own home and also represented the family in the counsels of the village community…These are the people described as the elders, and they are often, and by implication always, said to be the elders of something or somewhere…The functions performed by the elders are accordingly deliberative, representative and judicial.”⁵

Families Became Clans, and Clans Became Nations.

As these clans and villages began to multiply, they eventually grew to become tribes and cities. As they did, this system of communal leadership continued to grow and develop as well. The “senior elders” or patriarchs of each clan would come together to form a council of elders to lead the tribe or the city. (see Joshua 20:4, Ruth 4:2)

In his studies of ancient near-east communities, Henri Frankfort writes that there were “clan and community organization under elders who apparently exercised judicial as well as executive functions.It was a primitive democracy, uncritical and unconscious, for there is no ground to suppose other than that every senior member of the group was admitted to the governing body purely on the basis of his age.”⁶

This was not a formal, parliamentary style of government, which many of us think of today. Rather, as Henri goes on to point out, it was an informal, community of elders who simply worked together to lead. A good example can be seen in the negotiations concerning the redemption of Naomi’s property by Boaz in Ruth 4:1-2.

As tribes began to multiply and become a nation, it was from these small informal beginnings that national government would begin to form. It was “the stress of circumstance” that “compelled the coalescence of the smaller groups of clans and tribes into some approximation of a national unity.”⁷

The “senior elders” of each tribe would come together to form a council of elders to lead the nation. The same system developed for local family government grew into “national” governments.

This idea was not limited to Israel alone. We see the same idea of “elders of a household” in Egypt (Genesis 50:7). Fathers and mothers of one family would become elders to the clan. Those who led their clan well would become elders to the entire tribe, and eventually, those with the best leadership abilities would be recognized as leaders to the nations (the entire extended family). This story is repeated throughout the development of almost all ancient people groups around the world.

As communities grew, so did the development of the eldership.

A father would lead in the home and represent his family outwardly to the clan.
The senior patriarch of the clan would lead the elders in the village and also represent the clan outwardly as an elder to the tribe.
“Chiefs” would be appointed among the tribal elders to lead the group and would also go to represent the tribe more broadly at the national level.
And eventually, the patriarchal authority of a father to a single family developed and led to the role of judges and kings as heads of nations.

Living in rural Africa, I can personally testify that this same system of “family elders” and “clan leadership” is still alive and functioning in the world. I have been privileged to sit with the elders of clans to discuss the Word of God, and I have been honored to meet the Omukuka (King) of the Bamasaba people I live among.^**

This family-derived eldership was well in place among the Jews well before God instituted the Jewish religious law and leadership through Moses.

Side Note: Eldership was Not an Achievement of Personal Status, but a Service to the Community

In the modern world, politicians are known for seeking governmental office as a means of personal gain. And unfortunately, this attitude of status-seeking has not remained in the secular realm but has infected the church as well.

One major element in understanding the call of biblical leadership and what it means to “follow your leader” is to see that from the earliest iterations of eldership, it was viewed as a work of service intended for the betterment of the entire community. It was never about personal gain and social status.

As Campbell writes: “How did people become elders in Ancient Israel? It is nowhere recorded, but… clearly there can be no candidacy nor procedure leading to such a position of honour” because “elders represent leadership from below, not from above.”⁸ He goes on to say that although a person’s family position would play a part, so did a person’s “gradual acquiring respect” within the broader community.

If a person’s motivation for seeking leadership were self-serving and status-seeking, the community would rightfully choose not to follow them.

Anyways, let’s get back on track…

Eldership Expanded with Continued National Development

As the family of Abraham became the nation of Israel, other leaders were added to the “elders” of the people. It moved away from only including the patriarchal leaders of the home, clan, and tribe and came to include other leaders viewed as vital to the community as a whole. Again, this was true both inside and outside of Israel. For example, the role of historians and legal scholars would often be added to the group to oversee the continuity of the nation’s culture, traditions, and system of justice (such as scribes and lawyers).

Religious leaders came to be included with the elders to oversee the spiritual guidance of the nation. This would include the prophets and priests of Israel, but also the witchdoctors, shamans, and mystics in other pagan people groups.

We can watch this development take place in ancient Israel.

By the time we finish reading Genesis and move into Exodus, Abraham’s family has grown from one household to become a nation of people numbering in the millions. However, Exodus still begins with a kind of reverence for the patriarchs of the twelve tribes of Israel (see Exodus 1:1-7). These men and their firstborn heirs would be recognized as the “elders” of Israel. It is these elders who Moses speaks to about God’s promise of deliverance in Exodus 4:29.

However, after God brings the nation of Israel out of the land of Egypt, it became clear that these heads of families were not enough to maintain quality governance outside of Egyptian oversight. Therefore, upon the advice of his father-in-law, Moses appoints “judges” and “chiefs” over different numbers of people (“of thousands, of hundreds, of fifties, and of tens”) in addition to the existing patriarchal leaders. (see Exodus 18:25-26).

These judges were led directly by Moses, who not only served as a kind of “chief justice” but also became known as the greatest prophet in Israel’s history. His brother, Aaron, served as Israel’s first “Chief Priest,” and his family and descendants became the priesthood of the nation.

Then, according to Clowny, “Among the thousands of judges appointed under this system, seventy were singled out as the elders of the nation, to represent all the people, much as the elders of a tribe or city would represent their constituency.”⁹

Moses was first led by God, and in turn, he led these 70 elders to govern, guide, and direct the nation. These leaders, too, were Spirit-filled and were expected to lead the nation physically AND spiritually (Numbers 11:24-25).

No Longer was the Nation Only Goverend by the Presiding Patriarchs of the Family.

Yes, familial leadership was still honored and involved at every level of Jewish leadership. After all, they were still one family. Yet the broader system of government grew and eventually came to include the prophets, priests, judges, and eventually (though it was never God’s plan for Israel) a king.

These groups of elders still governed in their respective clans, tribes, and cities. And at the national level, among all of these highly respected leaders, a select group was consistently organized together to make up the highest-ranking council of elders who served in unity under a “senior elder,” generally the presiding High Priest.

Following the Babylonian captivity, which destroyed all of Israel’s governmental infrastructure, Ezra, the priest, and Nehemiah, the governor called together a group of returnees to re-form the religious law of life in Israel (Nehemiah 8-10). Among this group were a number of already-recognized leaders (Nehemiah 8:4) as well as a number of teachers (Nehemiah 8:7). This group developed into a new council of elders which Rabbinic tradition calls “Great Synagogue” (“Knesset HaGedolah”) who would continue to lead Israel throughout the 5th and 4th centuries.¹⁰ Some of the leaders historically listed as members of the Great Synagog were Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi, Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, Azariah, Mordechai, and Zerubbabel.¹¹

By the time we get to the New Testament, the Great Synagogue had gone away, but elder-led government remained active in Israel, now in the form of the “Sanhedrin.” Every village and city had its own council of 23 elders (called a “lesser Sanhedrin”), as did the nation as a whole with the 71 member “Greater Sanhedrin.”¹² Each Sanhedrin council was led by the “nasi” meaning “prince” or captain” (or what I would call the “senor elder.”

Though the prophets had been silent for 400 years, and the royal family was dethroned since captivity, the “elders” of the nation remained as the leaders of the nation, including the High Priest, priests, scribes, rabbis, Sadducees, and Pharisees.

How Did Eldership Incorporate into the Church?

Well, that is where we will turn our attention in the next post.

But just to whet your appetite a bit, just think of these familiar New Testament themes in light of what we have discussed in this post:

Jesus has brought us into the family of God, crying out, “Abba Father.”
Jesus is our King, and we are His “holy nation.
Jesus is our great “High Priest,” and we are His “royal priesthood.”

It should come as no surprise, then, that when Jesus decided to establish a type of leadership in His family, Kingdom, and priesthood, He would follow the same model developed throughout Israel in the Old Testament (and in some form, every other nation on earth).

We will discuss what that looked like, next time. Stay tuned…

If you’re enjoying the content I produce, a little caffeine to keep me going would be appreciated!

Footnotes

^** Side Note: The move of the enemy to destroy families is not just an attack on the home, but on the leadership structures put in place by God in humanity

¹ Strong, James. A Concise Dictionary of the Words in the Greek Testament and The Hebrew Bible. (Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software, 2009).

² The General Council of the Assemblies of God. Assemblies of God: Position Papers. (Springfield, MO: The General Council of the Assemblies of God, 1972–2017).

³ Edmund P. Clowney, The Message of 1 Peter: The Way of the Cross, The Bible Speaks Today (Leicester, England; Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1988), 232.

⁴ Campbell, R. Alastair. The Elders: Seniority within Earliest Christianity. (London; New York: T&T Clark, 2004), 21.

⁵ Campbell, “The Elders”, 21.

⁶ Frankfort, Henri. The Intellectual Adventure of Ancient Man. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1946), 343. Available from Archive.org <https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.283260 >. [2 August 2023].

⁷ Frankfort, Intellectual Adventure, p. 344.

⁸ Campbell, “The Elders,” 26–27.

⁹ Clowney, “Message of 1 Peter”, 232–233.

¹⁰ Youngblood, Ronald F., F. F. Bruce, and R. K. Harrison, Thomas Nelson Publishers, eds. Nelson’s New Illustrated Bible Dictionary. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, Inc., 1995.

¹¹ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Assembly

¹² https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanhedrin

Follow the Leader: What Does “Submission” Mean?

A. Scott Ingram Biblical Leadership, Gospel Leadership biblical submission, Church, church leaders, leadership, ministry, ministry leadership, pastor, pastoral authority, pastors, submit to leaders 1

Part 1: What Does “Submission” Mean?

As we begin this journey looking at whether Christians should submit to their pastor as a spiritual authority and what that means, we must first lay the groundwork of what it actually means to “submit” from a biblical perspective.

Throughout the New Testament, the Bible uses the phrase “submit” and “be subject to” a number of times in various contexts. For example, the Bible says,

“Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.”
James 4:7

and

“For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery.”
Galatians 5:1

However, diving into the Greek language offers a few different implications on what it means to submit ourselves to someone or something, depending on the context and circumstances. For example, the word “submit” in these two verses is not translated from the same word in the original language.

Before we can answer the question of to who, when, and how Christians must live in submission, we must discern the different variations of the word “submit” used by biblical authors.

The most common word for “submit” is ὑποτάσσω (hypotassō).

Hypotassō is used 41 times in the New Testament and means “to be subject to,” “to be subordinate to,” or “the be ranked below.” This word carries the most common understanding of the word “submit” to a modern English speaker. It implies that there is a hierarchy of authority in place and that we are required to surrender ourselves to that higher authority.

This word comes from the root word “tassō,” meaning that something is “appointed” or “put in order,” (which again implies a hierarchy of authority). And from this root, we get other words such as “epitasso” and “protasso,” meaning “to command”; “diatasso,” meaning “to give orders;” and even “antitasso” or “to resist.”

The Bible uses the word hypotassō frequently to tell Christians that God expects us to live in submission to people and institutions He created that carry an inherent authority.

Let’s look at just a few, beginning with the first example above…

We First Submit to God

“Submit (hypotassō) yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.”
James 4:7

The Bible requires Christians to live under the authority of God as the head. This also means that we are to submit to God’s Word, His laws and decrees, and His righteousness (See Romans 8:7 and Romans 10:3).

There is a Submission within Families

The call to submit to God is repeated again using marriage as a mirror-image example.

“Now as the church submits (hypotassō) to Christ, so also wives should submit (hypotassō) in everything to their husbands.”
Ephesians 5:24

All of mankind is to live in submission to God first, and then within the family, there is a hierarchy of authority and accountability before the Lord. Wives submit to their husbands as the leader in the marriage, and children are to submit to the authority of their parents (see 1 Timothy 3:4 and Jesus’ own example in Luke 2:51).

We Submit to Governmental Authority

“Let every person be subject (hypotassō) to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God.”
Romans 13:1

“Be subject(hypotassō) for the Lord’s sake to every human institution, whether it be to the emperor as supreme…”
1 Peter 2:13

We Submit to the Church

Jesus established the Church — the body of Christ — and throughout the New Testament, we find that there are a number of calls on Christ-followers to submit to the authority He placed within the body. However, there are a number of different ways we are to do so:

Mutual Submission Between Fellow Believers:

“…giving thanks always and for everything to God the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, submitting(hypotassō) to one another out of reverence for Christ.”
Ephesians 5:20–21 (ESV)

At first, this kind of “mutual submission” is confusing because there cannot be a hierarchy when we equally submit to one another. However, the implication is that when we come to the community of faith, we recognize that the Holy Spirit lives inside of each one of us, and therefore, we honor His authority which we equally carry as His children. This “mutual submission” leads to a holy unity within the faith community.

Submission to Our Predecessors/Forerunners in Christ:

The Bible teaches us that we will find it safe to submit ourselves to those who are further along in their spiritual walk than us and whose faith has clearly stood up to the test of time. We can follow their lead.

“Now I urge you, brothers—you know that the household of Stephanas were the first converts in Achaia, and that they have devoted themselves to the service of the saints— be subject(hypotassō) to such as these, and to every fellow worker and laborer.”
1 Corinthians 16:15–16

Mutual Submission Between Fellow Ministers:

This last verse also calls us to humbly be subject to good examples when they are our “fellow workers, and laborers.” These may be men and women who did not come before us in the faith, nor have they necessarily gone farther than us in maturity, but as we work together in the ministry, we are also called to be “mutually submissive” to the ones we serve alongside. The point is that no matter how “big” we grow in Christ, nor our “role” in the ministry, we never outgrow the call to submit ourselves within the body of Christ.

Submission to “Elders:”

It is still within this larger context of “mutual submission” within the body of Christ that we are called to submit to the “elders” in the church.

“Likewise, you who are younger, be subject (hypotassō) to the elders. Clothe yourselves, all of you, with humility toward one another, for “God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble.”
1 Peter 5:5

Now, while a surface-level reading of this verse seems to imply that young Christians should submit to the older, more mature people in the church, that is not necessarily the case when you read it in context. (In the next post, we will dive deeper into where the idea of submission to “elders” developed.)

For now, the point is that the Bible clearly commands us to “hypotassō” to the authorities delegated by the Lord. We are obligated to submit to God Himself, to Governments, to our Families, and to the Community of Faith.¹

This makes sense since these three — Family, Government, and the Church — are the three institutions that God created in the world. He gave authority to each one, even as each one was designed to function in full submission to Him.

There is another word in the Bible that some translators use as “submit.” It is the Greek word εἴκω (eikō) or ὑπείκω (hypeikō).

Whereas “hypotassō” gives a formal command to submit, this word does not. Rather, eikō implies that there must be a willingness to submit on the part of the person being led. This is not a hierarchy or an institutional authority. It might better be translated as “willingly yield” to them.

This word is only used twice in the New Testament (each form only once). The first is used in the book of Hebrews:

“Obey your leaders and submit(hypeikō) to them, for they are keeping watch over your souls, as those who will have to give an account. Let them do this with joy and not with groaning, for that would be of no advantage to you.”
Hebrews 13:17

The word “obey” in this verse literally means “be persuaded” or “be convinced” to obey your leaders by their life, reputation, godliness, and leadership. Then, once you are convinced of their credibility and faithfulness to the Lord, you can trust them enough to “willingly yield” yourself to follow them.

This is not a mandate that you must submit. It’s a willingness to follow their lead. As you become convinced that they are quality leaders, then you willingly begin to “yield” to them. You choose to make room for these people to influence you.

Who are these leaders?

One interesting point to make regarding this verse is that the word “leaders” is not talking about institutional leadership within the church, and it is not talking about the elders we read about in 1 Peter 5:5.

The word for leaders here is “hegoumenois,” which is just a general Greek term for highly-respected people in the community. They have risen to be considered leaders only because their lifestyle has “convinced” the community of their trustworthiness, not because they have hierarchical authority.

Hegoumenois is also used in Acts 15:22, alongside the other word, “elders,” which we have seen before:

“Then it seemed good to the apostles and the elders, with the whole church, to choose men from among them and send them to Antioch with Paul and Barnabas. They sent Judas called Barsabbas, and Silas, leading men (hegoumenois) among the brothers…”

These “leading men” do not have God-mandated authority. Their status in the community comes from their life’s reputation and the respect they have earned over time, which has led to their being chosen as worthy leaders among the people.

The only other biblical example of this word for “yielding” or “submission” is in Galatians 2:4-5 wherein Paul recounts his first public visit to Jerusalem:

“Yet because of false brothers secretly brought in—who slipped in to spy out our freedom that we have in Christ Jesus, so that they might bring us into slavery— to them we did not yield in submission (eikō) even for a moment, so that the truth of the gospel might be preserved for you.”

Once again, we see that this type of submission or yielding comes from a willingness to do so based on the credibility and faithfulness of the person the be followed. If there is no faithfulness in the person, then there is no submission!

There is one other Greek word for which English translations use the word “Submit”: δογματίζω (dogmatizō).²

This type of submission is not appointed by God, nor is it based on the credibility and faithfulness of the person. Rather, it is obedience that is developed out of a commitment to a set of beliefs. Literally, it is “to practice what you preach” or to “live out to what you claim to believe.”

This word, “dogmatizō,” comes from the word “dogma,” which refers to rules, regulations, or “doctrine,” and means that we place ourselves into subjection and obedience to this set of rules or doctrines through our belief in them. The word “dogma” itself comes from another root word, “dokeō,” meaning “to think,” “suppose,” or “believe in,” a subjective set of thoughts.

Simply put, it means that you begin with a belief system or worldview (dokeō). That system of beliefs leads to a series of rules or regulations based upon those beliefs (dogma). And then, you submit yourself to that set of regulations to demonstrate your full buy-in and commitment to the worldview (dogmatizō).

The only example of this word in scripture is found in Colossians 2:20-21:

“If with Christ you died to the elemental spirits of the world, why, as if you were still alive in the world, do you submit to regulations (dogmatizō) — “Do not handle, Do not taste, Do not touch” (referring to things that all perish as they are used)—according to human precepts and teachings?”

You can paraphrase Paul’s question like this: When you died in Christ and were raised to new life into God’s eternal life, your whole worldview necessarily changed (repentance or metanoia). You have been raised to new life – “born again” – and discovered God’s truth (dogma) in this new reality, and it “makes you free” (John 8:32). So why, then, do you still live as though this paradigm shift never happened, and still submit yourself to the old rules and regulations of the earth and flesh. Those practices are formed from worldly mindsets and beliefs and have no place in the life of a heavenly-minded, Christ-like believer.

The lesson we should take from this verse is that there are some spiritual teachers out there who you may not be able to judge their credibility by their reputation and lifestyle. You simply don’t have the time or ability to get to know them deeply (think of traveling evangelists or TikTok preachers, whom you cannot get to know at a personal level). Paul is implying that we must initially judge them — and whether or not we should submit to them — by analyzing what they teach according to the Gospel of Jesus Christ, as recorded in the Word of God.

The truth is that many false teachers (back in Colossae and now today) will utilize spiritual-sounding teachings and religious-looking rituals, to try and trap people into their system of religion and thereby control them. (We will come back to this topic in Part 3 of this series.)

The answer to this problem is to compare everything we are taught, from any spiritual leader or mentor, with the Word of God and verify the accuracy of it before we submit ourselves in obedience.

Let’s Get Practical

As I said in the introduction to this series, we are eventually going to explore the often-stated view that “Christians must submit to their pastor” and whether or not that is biblically true. However, to begin a little more broadly than just submitting to “your pastor,” let’s devise a test of whether someone ought to have authority over us, no matter what their title is.

Since we have looked at three types of submission that are laid out in the scriptures, I think we can utilize three relevant questions when deciding who we should submit ourselves to, before we get to the how in future a post:

1. Does the person hold to and teach true biblical doctrine?

Since our submission (dogmatizō) can be based on the doctrines and worldview of a person, then we need to make sure their beliefs and the things they are teaching are biblical before we follow them.

The prerequisite to making this determination is that, as Christians, we MUST study the scriptures and know what God says is true for our own selves. That way, when someone tries to bring a new teaching, religious practice, or spiritual “rule” they want us to follow, we can treat it just as the Berean Jews did when Paul and Silas came to preach the gospel to them.

“Now these Jews were more noble than those in Thessalonica; they received the word with all eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see if these things were so.”
Acts 17:11

We cannot allow the emotional promises they make, the passions of our flesh, or an internal desire to look spiritual or religious to lead us into blindly following bad leaders who are looking to keep us in bondage to their control, pride, and/or self-serving motives.

If they are not teaching from a foundation of biblical truth, do not submit to their dictates and rules.

2. Does this person’s reputation as a Christian, their faithfulness to Jesus, and their maturity as a disciple make them credible as a mentor in the faith?

A person may not be commissioned to a formal office in the church. That does not mean they cannot be a respected leader (hegoumenois) within the body of Christ and a helpful guide to you in your own Christian walk.

We must be willing to learn from and yield ourselves (hypeikō) to those who are farther along in the journey to Christ-likeness than we are. A person does not need a “title” on their business card to help guide us closer to Jesus. They simply have to know the next steps to take a little better than we do.

Conversely, if someone desires to be a leader, but their spiritual life is a mess, we probably don’t want to follow their example. It doesn’t even matter if they believe and teach what is true!

If they are unable or unwilling to live out the Christian faith for themselves, we should not submit to them.

3. Does this person have delegated authority from God within the church that I am biblically mandated to submit to (hypotassō)?

And just as importantly, has the local body of Christ been persuaded (hypeikō) that this person carries the gifts and callings of God, which grants them the reputation to be a church leader?

If God has called and appointed a person as a leader to the local fellowship of believers, then their role comes with a certain authority from the Lord to lead. However, we must be clear that no one can appoint themselves to the place of leadership! Only God can release these callings on people (see Ephesians 4:11), and when He does so, the Bible makes it clear that the person’s “office” will be highlighted by the Holy Spirit, and the calling will be recognized, tested, and “ordained” (or “commissioned”) by the church. A person CANNOT choose to become an apostle, a prophet, a pastor, an elder, or an overseer for themselves.

God-appointed church leadership will receive authority from the Lord to fulfill their calling, but they also have strict qualifications they must meet first before they can walk in that authority! Therefore, if the local body of Christ does recognize them as a God-appointed leader, it is still necessary and reasonable to ensure they are qualified by the first two questions before we submit ourselves to them. If they truly are appointed by God, we should expect them to pass those tests easily.

If ANY leader says their dictates, teachings, and life choices cannot be questioned by a regular Christian, then they have already failed the test of leadership, and you SHOULD NOT submit to them.

In Conclusion

The Bible never calls a believer to submit to ONE person as their personal spiritual leader, unless His name is Jesus! It does not matter whether that is “their pastor” or any other title they choose to be called, “apostle,” “bishop,” “spritual father,” etc, they are NOT mandated to be a person’s sole spiritual authority.

We should never submit to “one person” as our sole spiritual authority. That is dangerous!

Instead, we must realize that every Christian needs a solid network of mentors in the faith.

Where there is no guidance, a people falls, but in an abundance of counselors there is safety.
Proverbs 11:14

A wise man is full of strength, and a man of knowledge enhances his might, for by wise guidance you can wage your war, and in abundance of counselors there is victory.
Proverbs 24:5-6

Christians Must Seek Out Quality Mentors from within the Body of Christ

This means that just because a local fellowship does not recognize the person as an official church leader, pastor, or elder, we may still refer to the first two questions and choose whether or not a person is someone we should choose to follow to help us grow in Christ. Mature believers can help us grow by sharing their wisdom, experience, and advice, so we should seek it out.

Be aware, though, that many people in the body of Christ will meet the requirements of the first two questions, but it does not make it mandatory that we submit to every person who meets these criteria.

Discernment is necessary! God will bring certain people into your life that He intends for you to follow and learn from. We must listen to the Holy Spirit for guidance on who we should follow and what the season is, for which He is giving them to us as helpers and mentors. Accepting a mentor in one area of life does not mean that we follow them in all things or for the rest of our lives!

We must determine which church leaders God has ordained us to follow.

When we move to the third question and find those whom God has appointed to be leaders in the body of Christ, then submission becomes less of an ‘option’ or ‘choice.’ Rather, the question becomes more about determining the boundaries of their God-given authority in our life.

The Bible mandates that there are leaders in the church we are to submit to. However, which local church we are a part of and, therefore, which church leaders we are each called to follow is not the same for every believer. We must determine who God has ordained us to follow and then determine what He expects our submission to them to look like.

That, then, is the topic we will begin to pick up on in the next post.

Click Here to Continue to Part 2: “The Biblical History of Elders”

If you’re enjoying the content I produce, a little caffeine to keep me going would be appreciated!

Footnotes:

¹ There is one other way that “hypotassō” is used in the Bible, which is in reference to bondservants obeying their masters (see Titus 2:9 and 1 Peter 2:18). Now, though we don’t have time to discuss the differences between modern slavery and what was going on in ancient Israel, we can suffice it to say that biblical slavery was working for someone to whom you owed a debt, in order to repay them. I believe we can safely surmise that the modern equivalent is that employees are expected to be submissive to their employers since there is a financial benefit for you in the workplace transaction. If someone is paying you to do work, then they are the boss to tell you how it should be done. When you decide to stop submitting and ‘quit,’ the understanding is that they will also stop paying you.

² Note: Some versions, such as the ESV use the word “submit” to translate the word enechō in Galatians 5:1 — “For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery.” I don’t think this gives a clear translation of the word, however. Enechō literally means you have been taken forcefully or trapped by the thing and are being made to obey against your will. It means you are ensnared into submission, or you have allowed yourself to become “entangled” with it, as the KJV says. I like the way the Bible in Basic English Version reads: “Christ has truly made us free: then keep your free condition and let no man put a yoke on you again.”

Follow The Leader – Series Intro

A. Scott Ingram Biblical Leadership, Gospel Leadership biblical submission, Church, church leaders, leadership, ministry, ministry leadership, pastor, pastoral authority, pastors, submit to leaders 0

The more ‘international’ my ministry becomes, the broader my understanding of the gospel and God’s Kingdom grows. As I interact with new cultures, I become ever more thankful for the grace of Jesus Christ to redeem humanity to Himself. As I see how the gospel has impacted nations, tribes, and communities, my faith is increased in the power of God’s restoration and grace.

However, as I have the opportunity to meet with all kinds of church leadership through conferences, training events, crusades, discipleship meetings, and more, I am also becoming more aware of the sinfulness inherent in every man and the proclivity to misuse the gifts and callings God has placed on us, for our own benefit.

Disclaimer

This brief series was inspired by a couple of Facebook posts from men I admire, which came on the heels of a difficult interaction with a few leaders I work with. My response was to be a brief comment in reply, which I then determined should be a brief live video instead to be able to explain my thoughts more effectively. However, as I began to jot down a few notes and scriptures for that video, I got sucked down the rabbit hole and came out with over ten pages of notes and what would likely be a 2-hour video teaching. I have therefore decided to put it out there as a blog series, which can easily be reviewed, the cited scriptures studied, and comments made directly.

Before I jump into what will likely be a sensitive topic, let me first say that I love the church, and I value the leaders God has called to this honorable work. My intention in writing is to edify and exhort; not to criticize.

Statement: “Christians Must Submit to Their Pastor.”

Statements such as this are becoming a trend I am seeing come up, over and over again, in various nations and communities around the world. It is not a new view. In fact, it has affected the church since the earliest days of appointing leaders. I do believe it is becoming a strong point of contention once again, and one I find myself struggling to keep in balance as a leader of leaders.

I do not necessarily disagree with the statement, but I certainly do not agree with it either. The truth behind the statement can only be found in the intention of the one making it.

That is because so much of the statement needs clarification before we can ‘prove’ its validity:

What does “submission” mean?
Who is qualified to be a “pastor” deserving of submission?
What makes you “their” pastor?
What are the boundaries of the pastor’s authority over a Christian’s life?

As you can see, this gets complicated quickly. So over the next few weeks, I want to try to answer some of these questions and maybe a few more.

I want to give us some clarity on what biblical submission looks like and the boundaries God places around our authority as leaders.

But first…

I would like to hear from you.

What has been your experience with calls to “submit” as a Christian?
What expectations do you have as a Pastor for the believers in your church to obey your authority and leading?
In your experience, what are some benefits of submission to godly leadership?
What are some dangers that can arise in submission to a pastor?
What questions do you have about submission in the biblical sense?

Please let me know in the comments.

I am posting this on Friday afternoon and will follow up with the first post of my series on Tuesday next week, but I want to incorporate my responses to your experience and questions in this series, so it would be a huge help if you take time to leave a comment below. My one request is that when you comment, please at least include the country where you live and serve, and if you’re comfortable and it adds to your post, you can also include the denominational background you come from.

Remember, this series is to build up and encourage, so keep that in mind with your comments. I ask that you DO NOT use this as an opportunity to bash any specific leader or group. If your comment has a sense of hatefulness rather than an air of “helpful critique,” it will not be posted.

Continue to Part 1… “What Does Submission Mean?”

Jump to Part 2… “The Biblical History of Elders”

If you’re enjoying the content I produce, a little caffeine to keep me going would be appreciated!

1634414203.327981-01E7514D-CC4C-4998-A805-B58C8F0F92EB

October 19 2021

Orthopraxy: Welcoming Visitors

A. Scott Ingram Gospel Leadership, Practical Ministry Bible, Christian Life, Church, Gospel Leadership, Jesus, Leading a Church, ministry, orthopraxy, Practical Ministry 1

Many of the topics we will discuss in this series have strong biblical foundations. For example, practices such as corporate prayer, intercession, and fellowship all have theological roots in scripture, which regulate how we participate in them. However, other things we will look at are things most churches practice, yet the biblical links are minimal. That isn’t to say they are unbiblical or not good, only that they are often more culturally-based than scripturally. Despite this fact, I want to go deep into everything we do as a church and see how the Bible does imply we should view those activities.

One of these practices, which we will look at today, seems to be a regular part of church life everywhere in the world I have been privileged to visit and ministry. That is our practice of welcoming guests.

Current Trends

How we welcome guests varies from one culture to another. For example, in America, many churches have a designated area to meet with guests, either before or after services. Some give first-time visitors gifts, such as coffee cups with the church name, a bag of candies, or some other small trinket, as well as ask the guests to fill out some form of information card. In addition, volunteers are usually available at the entry or in various places around the church to answer any questions guests may have or to simply greet them and make them feel welcomed.

While most churches in the U.S. will take a moment in the service to welcome visitors, they are usually asked to meet with someone in the designated guest area after the service, rather than having any pressure put on them to move or speak at that moment.

This is very different from what I have seen in East Africa, where I live and work as a missionary. Instead, in Uganda and Kenya, time is made in the service to welcome guests, who are usually asked to stand and receive some kind of personal greeting from the whole church.

In fact, in most small to medium-sized churches, visitors are usually asked to speak, telling the church who they are, where they come from, if they are born-again, where they usually “pray from,” and what brought them to the service that day. Giving the visitors this opportunity to speak is a culturally appropriate way to honor them and show that the church values them.

In the U.S., asking first-time visitors to speak would be quite awkward for them, making them feel put on the spot. Most guests would rather not have everyone’s attention put on them. However, an informal request to fill out an informational card would make guests in East Africa feel undervalued. That culture takes pride in giving time to people, whether personally or in group settings.

The point is that while every culture is different, churches everywhere want to make guests feel welcomed.

What Does the Bible Say?

While the Bible does not have anything specific to say about how we greet guests in our services, it does have a lot to say about hospitality and welcoming outsiders.

The Church is Commanded to Show Hospitality

The Lexham Bible Dictionary defines hospitality as “the generous and gracious treatment of guests.” (1) This is why the author of Hebrews commands the church:

“Let brotherly love continue [which deals with biblical fellowship]. Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers, for thereby some have entertained angels unawares.”
^{Hebrews 13:1–2 (emphasis mine)}

In the same way, Paul explains what the culture of the church ought to be in the book of Romans:

“Let love be genuine. Abhor what is evil; hold fast to what is good. Love one another with brotherly affection. Outdo one another in showing honor. Do not be slothful in zeal, be fervent in spirit, serve the Lord. Rejoice in hope, be patient in tribulation, be constant in prayer. Contribute to the needs of the saints and seek to show hospitality.”
^{Romans 12:9–13 (emphasis mine)}

In many places in scripture, it is clear that, though we are members of the local church fellowship and care for one another, we should also be conscious of how we treat strangers (or we might say, “newcomers”), as we welcome them with grace and hospitality.

Church Leaders are Commanded to Value Outsiders

If it is not enough that the church is commanded to show hospitality, the Apostle Paul also, very clearly, instructs church leadership to value and show hospitality to outsiders. He writes to Timothy, the pastor at Ephesus:

“Therefore an overseer must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, sober-minded, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach… Moreover, he must be well thought of by outsiders, so that he may not fall into disgrace, into a snare of the devil.”
^{1 Timothy 3:3,7 (emphasis mine)}

And again, he writes to Titus, the Pastor at Crete:

“For an overseer, as God’s steward, must be above reproach. He must not be arrogant or quick-tempered or a drunkard or violent or greedy for gain, but hospitable, a lover of good, self-controlled, upright, holy, and disciplined.”
^{Titus 1:7–8 (emphasis mine)}

Even in the way a church service runs, especially the use of spiritual gifts, Paul wants to make sure we are aware of the impact it has on visitors:

“If, therefore, the whole church comes together and all speak in tongues, and outsiders or unbelievers enter, will they not say that you are out of your minds? But if all prophesy, and an unbeliever or outsider enters, he is convicted by all, he is called to account by all…”
^{1 Corinthians 14:23–24 (emphasis mine)}

We will come back to this passage in a minute.

Let’s Get Practical

It is clear from all of this that when the church meets together, it should pay attention to guests and make sure they feel welcomed and valued. The question is, in light of all the reasons the church gathers, how should we treat guests, and is there a limit?

Again, the cultural background of the church will have a lot to say about specifics. However, I think there are some general guidelines we can use to ensure our guests are valued appropriately.

1. Jesus Must Be the Focus

While we want to make guests feel at home among us, the truth is that non-believers should see Jesus exalted in prayer and worship, hear the gospel preached, and be confronted with their need for salvation. Unfortunately, many churches have moved too far into the “seeker-sensitive” realm and refuse to talk about sin, the cross, or God’s judgment, because those topics might make people uncomfortable.

When we come into the church, we must always keep in mind that Jesus is the focus; not the visitors. Though we are happy to have them and should go out of our way to welcome them, the service is not about them or even for them. In the same way, it is not about us, people’s comfort, meeting needs, or anything else. It is about Jesus. It is for Him.

When too much emphasis is on visitors and their comfort, the church becomes another social club rather than a house of God. However, when Jesus is the focus, we will see the lost get saved. We will see the church grow. We will see lives changed. And so much more.

2. Visitors Are Guests of Jesus

Although we should not center our service around visitors and their needs or comfort, we also must make sure we view them in light of God’s grace and mission. We must have a healthy respect for God’s sovereignty and the work of the Holy Spirit in their lives, and understand that He is ultimately the one who brought them into our services. They are His guests first; ours second.

As such, our attitudes toward visitors should be guided by the realization that Jesus has big plans for them, and the Holy Spirit should guide our actions toward them. This is what Paul was talking about when he wrote to the Corinthian church:

“But if all prophesy, and an unbeliever or outsider enters, he is convicted by all, he is called to account by all, the secrets of his heart are disclosed, and so, falling on his face, he will worship God and declare that God is really among you.”
^{1 Corinthians 14:24–25}

This means that, while we may have great volunteers to greet guests, welcome gifts for them to take home, or special time in the service for them to introduce themselves, our ultimate goal should be to be the hands, feet, and mouth of Jesus toward them. The best care we can offer to guests is that they would have an encounter with Jesus.

It’s All About Jesus. Seek Him and Follow His Lead.

I would highly encourage you to pray and ask the Holy Spirit how your church can better welcome guests prophetically. In other words, ask Him how He would welcome guests if He were leading the service, then do that. After all, it is His church, and the service is for Him. They are His guests, and we are His servants.

As I am fond of saying, the goal of everything in the Christian life is “listen to God, and do what He says.” Greeting visitors is no different. We will do well, therefore, if we can keep our focus on Jesus and follow His leading toward His guests.

Let’s Connect

If you want more than just the blog, join me on social media for more #ChristianLife and #Gospel Leadership insights throughout the week. I can be found on Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and LinkedIn, and would love to see you there.

You can also make sure to never miss any future posts by subscribing to my newsletter below. I promise never to spam your inbox or share your info with others.

Endnotes

¹ Douglas K. Wilson, “Hospitality,” ed. John D. Barry et al., The Lexham Bible Dictionary (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2016).

If you’re enjoying the content I produce, a little caffeine to keep me going would be appreciated!

Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash

1634153632.10133-17EECED8-9DEB-4A83-9047-C57047A0EE61

October 13 2021

Orthopraxy: Fellowship

A. Scott Ingram Gospel Leadership, Practical Ministry Bible, Bible Study, Gospel, Holy Spirit, Jesus, koinonia, love, Scripture, unity 1

As we continue working our way through the practical side of church ministry, we have already looked at corporate prayer and intercession, which are foundational to the life of the church. As we read in Acts 2, following the day of Pentecost:

“So those who received (Peter’s) word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls. And they devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and the fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers.”
^{Acts 2:41-42}

When the church began, and thousands of new believers were added, the first thing Luke (the author of Acts) wants us to know is that there was great unity among them. They joined together around the Word of God (a topic we will get to in a few weeks), fellowship and sharing meals, and the prayers (which we have already looked at).

Today, we will turn our attention to biblical “fellowship,” as this word means something much different than the average 21st-century understanding demonstrates.

What is Fellowship

In Acts 2:42, the Greek word for fellowship is “koinonia.” If you have been around church very much, this is likely a word you have heard thrown around at various times when discussing an upcoming fellowship event, such as a church luncheon or a men’s meeting.

Usually, when we use the word fellowship, we imply a social gathering of believers. So we tell people, “make sure you get to church early, to have a time of fellowship before the service.” We encourage people to join a cell group or a Sunday school class, not only for the teaching but for fellowship. The idea being promoted is that if we are going to be believers together in the same “church,” then we need to take time to make friends with one another.

Can Friendship Be Forced?

The problem with many “fellowship” activities planned by church leaders is that they don’t always work the way we hope. Of course, we desire that believers would come to know one another deeply. However, when everyone comes together, people tend to sit with their family or existing friends instead of getting to know others. Even when we do mingle with people we don’t know, our “small talk” is usually very shallow and limited.

I don’t mean to imply that we must know every person deeply. Even if it were possible, it goes against our natural human inclinations. Most people would rather have a small group of people they know well, trust, and can be vulnerable around. It isn’t natural to fully expose our inward self to the masses. And that is okay.

Even as a senior ministry leader, myself, responsible for thousands of believers in the Sozo Ministries network of churches, I still tend toward introversion and take a long time to build deep friendships. I don’t necessarily want to have an intimate relationship with every person I meet just because they are Christian, and that is fine.

But the question is, then, what is the goal of fellowship, if not to be friends with everyone in our church?

The Foundation of Fellowship

The first answer is that true, biblical koinonia is grounded on our shared faith in Jesus Christ. It is “unity of faith” that the New Testament writers point to as the thing that holds us together as a body.

“If we say we have fellowship with him while we walk in darkness, we lie and do not practice the truth. But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus his Son cleanses us from all sin.”
^{1 John 1:6-7 (emphasis mine)}

According to John, we cannot have fellowship with one another unless we all walk in the light with Jesus Christ. He is our first partner in fellowship. As the head of the church, He is the one we seek intimacy with, which opens the door to intimacy within His body. Just look at how the Apostle Paul speaks of this relationship toward Jesus and one another in his letter to the Corinthians:

“I give thanks to my God always for you because of the grace of God that was given you in Christ Jesus, that in every way you were enriched in him in all speech and all knowledge— even as the testimony about Christ was confirmed among you — so that you are not lacking in any gift, as you wait for the revealing of our Lord Jesus Christ, who will sustain you to the end, guiltless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ. God is faithful, by whom you were called into the fellowship of his Son, Jesus Christ our Lord.”
^{1 Corinthians 1:4–9 (emphasis mine)}

Not only were you called into fellowship “with” Jesus Christ, but you were placed in the fellowship “of” Jesus Christ – that is with the community of believers who are with Him as well!

Fellowship in Unity

This means that when we come together as the body of Christ, we are not gathering because we are all friends with one another. Instead, we are gathering because we are all friends of Jesus, and together we can make more of our relationship with Him!

Think about it like this: have you ever been invited to a birthday party for a friend, only to arrive at the venue and discover you don’t know any of the other guests? I’m sure you didn’t turn around and leave just because your friend has made other friends throughout their life. Instead, I’ll bet you joined the party, met a few new people, and took part in celebrating the birthday boy or girl’s life together.

Every conversation you had with the other guests would be centered on this unity of celebrating your mutual friend: “How did you meet our friend?” “When did you meet them? “What stories can you tell me that I don’t know about our friend?” This is precisely what unity around Jesus looks like as well.

As we come together in fellowship as the church, we gather to celebrate our mutual friend, Jesus. We may not be friends with everyone in the room — in fact, we may not know another person there at all. That doesn’t matter because He is the focus. As we look at Him, discuss Him, sing to Him, share stories (testimonies) about Him, etc., the unity built among everyone in the room will be tangible. Unity in our love for Him is the foundation of our fellowship.

The Extention of Fellowship

I know as some of you read this, you are getting frustrated with me. Sure, we might not be capable of being friends with everyone in our church, but shouldn’t we at least try? Isn’t living as part of the faith community important?

The answer is yes, being a part of the community is very important. But, it isn’t the foundation. What I mean is that we should never encourage people to join our church “for community.” We are not a social club. We are the fellowship of Jesus Christ. Knowing Him is the foundation for which we gather in koinonia.

However, the extension of our fellowship becomes love for one another as we see Jesus’ love for each other. As the Apostle John tells us:

“We love because he first loved us. If anyone says, “I love God,” and hates his brother, he is a liar; for he who does not love his brother whom he has seen cannot love God whom he has not seen. And this commandment we have from him: whoever loves God must also love his brother.”
^{1 John 4:19-21}

I love verse 19! “We love because He first loved us.” Love for others is an extension of our fellowship with Him. As we live in intimacy with Him, the Bible tells us we become like Him (2 Corinthians 3:18; 1 John 3:2), and therefore, we begin to love others just as he loves them.

The Fruit of the Spirit

One biblical evidence that we are transforming into the image of Christ is that “the fruit of the Holy Spirit” will shape us and be demonstrated through our lives.

“But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control; against such things there is no law.”
^{Galatians 5:22-23}

What is interesting about this list is that we cannot demonstrate any of these fruits outside of a relationship with others.

Love must be shown to others.
Joy, in the Greek understanding, is the publicly shared celebration of gladness. Although we might be joyful in ourselves, the fruit of joy comes when it is shared.
Peace, again in the Greek understanding, means a cease to war. It is peace among people or harmony between parties who might otherwise be opposed to one another.
Patience and kindness are attitudes expressed toward others.
Goodness simply means we set our mind toward the public good in all things.
Faithfulness deals with both our commitment to faith in God, as well as our trustworthiness. As we live by faith in Christ, other people should be able to trust our integrity when they meet us.
Gentleness, again, is demonstrated in how we interact with people.
Self-control simply means keeping a level head and restraining our passions, sinful desires, and extreme emotions. Again, this ability to discipline ourselves is best demonstrated in our public life.

As a friend recently pointed out to me, many of these “fruit” are also mentioned in “the love passage” of the Bible:

“Love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful; it does not rejoice at wrongdoing, but rejoices with the truth. Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.”
^{1 Corinthians 13:4–7}

The point is that the character of Christ, which is formed in us through fellowship with Him, is outwardly demonstrated in our love for other people. Thus, love is the extension of our fellowship.

The Expression of Fellowship

If fellowship is founded on our unity in Christ and is extended as our love for others conforms to His love, then there must be a tangible expression of that fellowship when we come together as the body of Christ.

How are Jesus’ work in us and His love coming through us demonstrated in the church? Biblically, it was shown in the valuing of people over possessions. As Craig Keener writes in his book, Gift and Giver:

“Besides the numerical growth of the Christian community, the community grew in its cohesiveness through the believers’ commitment to one another. The Greek term for “fellowship” (Acts 2:42) could mean economic sharing as well as spending time together. When we go out to dinner with friends from our church, we often think we are doing well; and to be sure, such fellowship is better than the isolation many churchgoers feel today. But the first Christians were far more serious about fellowship in the biblical sense than we are. The believers “shared all things in common” (Acts 2:44).”¹

Giving 100% In The Offering

Now, we must understand that this sharing of all things literally meant all of their worldly possessions.

“And all who believed were together and had all things in common. And they were selling their possessions and belongings and distributing the proceeds to all, as any had need.”
^{Acts 2:44-45}

Remember, this was also centered in Jerusalem, the capital city of conquered Israel. The Roman Empire was taxing the average person at 90% of their income! “Selling their possession and belongings” wasn’t a believer deciding to give up a second television for the family or forego a new vehicle this year in order to tithe a little more. This meant taking the last 10% of their income (after the government took everything else) and still putting it into the offering plate at church. The expression of their fellowship meant keeping nothing for themselves, and in turn, trusting that the local community of faith would take care of them.

The love for others, created through their unity with Christ, inspired them to give all they had for each other. Unfortunately, this is a level of “fellowship” not seen in most of our churches today.

Love Feasts

Another expression of their fellowship came in “the breaking of bread” together, as they “received their food with glad and generous hearts” (Acts 2:46). These large communal meals became known as “agape feasts” or “love meals” and were an everyday part of the early church’s life. Sometimes they were coupled with taking communion (another part of celebrating Jesus together, which we will discuss in a future post). Other times, they were simply about sharing a meal as the family of God.

Because people had given everything they had to the church, it bound them to life together with other believers. Even if they were not friends with everyone in the church, there was a commitment to one another that went deeper than most family ties would today.

Things were not always perfect at these love feasts. For example, in Acts 6:1-7, we see that some groups within the church felt excluded by other groups and that the shared food was not being fairly distributed. However, the church leaders were quick to fix the issue, so that fellowship would not be broken. In fact, as much as we elevate deacons in the church today, the first deacons in the church were tasked with serving tables to ensure that the fellowship was maintained.

Another issue can be seen in Jude 12 concerning false spiritual leaders taking advantage of these love feasts. Nevertheless, love feasts continued as part of the life of the church for centuries.²

Creating Fellowship Today

The challenge we have today is that our world is entirely different from that of the early church 2000 years ago. Whereas the early church was limited by their location — there was no mass transit or mass communication — globalization has given us unending access to everything at any time. With the internet, I have access to all earthly knowledge in seconds. With YouTube tutorials, I can learn any skill I want. With modern transportation, I can be anywhere in the world in 48 hours or less.

Naturally, this access has shifted the focus of most modern individuals far beyond life in our local communities. Even as I write these words, I am continuously aware they will be read by believers all over the world — in the U.S., Europe, Africa, Asia, and the Middle East — many of whom do not share my cultural background. (I still don’t have a noticeable readership in South America or Australia, but maybe one day.)

As society’s focus has moved beyond the ties of physical location, the church is faced with a new set of challenges that the early church did not have. If our people live globally, how do we ground them with a fellowship locally?

I think the answer lies in returning to the foundation. We must lift up Jesus in our lives and seek to build relationships with others around Him. (And I mean face-to-face relationships, not online.) Of course, this will require a willingness to share our faith with unbelievers in personal evangelism. More than that, however, it requires a willingness to put ourselves out there and be vulnerable with other believers. We will never see a thriving local fellowship until we lead the way ourselves.

Let’s Get Practical

Inherent inside every Christian believer is a desire to be part of the body of Christ. As His character is developed in us and as the Holy Spirit releases gifts for service through us, the desire for fellowship is natural. Therefore, as leaders in the church, we must simply follow the process of Unity -> Love -> Expression to create a true biblical fellowship in our churches.

1. Celebrate Jesus

Any time the body of Christ comes together, we must make Jesus central.

Of course, we need to take time to greet our visitors and do other social things as the church. However, our primary focus must remain Jesus. Preach Jesus. Talk about Jesus. Share testimonies of what Jesus is doing. Invite people to know Jesus deeper.

We may never all become best friends, but we can all live in unity around Him. If the focus of the church ever leaves Him, true fellowship will be broken.

2. Encourage Love

As we lift up Jesus, we also aim to disciple people into His image. While the process of sanctification will take place internally in the lives of believers, as leaders, we ought to create opportunities for the fruit and gifts of the Spirit to be demonstrated externally.

Make room in your service for people to serve one another. Give time for those who have discovered their spiritual gifts to use them (and give opportunity for those who have not yet discovered their gifts to seek the Holy Spirit and try something).

I remember the first time I visited a friend’s church in college. When we arrived, I met the pastor, who asked me about my story and why I chose to come that night. Then, as if I belonged to the church already, he asked if I would help serve drinks to people as they arrived. I no longer felt like just a visitor because I had a job to do, serving everyone else who would come. Though it was a small act, it invited me to become part of the fellowship the church had been building for years.

3. Facilitate Corporate Expressions of Fellowship

For the early church, giving generously to the community and joining together in love feasts became regular and expected expressions of fellowship. Though these things can and should be part of our modern-day practice as well, I would also encourage you to consider your own church and see what other “expressions” of fellowship you can maintain regularly to keep people engaging with one another.

What can you do as a church that will give people the opportunity to gather in unity around Jesus and serve one another at the same time? Though I could give many examples in my own cultural context, I will leave this as an open-ended question for you to ponder for yourself.

Let’s Connect

If you want more than just a blog, join me on social media for more #ChristianLife and #Gospel Leadership insights throughout the week. I can be found on Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and LinkedIn, and would love to see you there.

You can also make sure to never miss any future posts by subscribing to my newsletter below. I promise never to spam your inbox or share your info with others.

Endnotes

¹ Craig S. Keener, Gift & Giver: The Holy Spirit for Today, Repackaged Edition. (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2020), 85.

² https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agape_feast

If you’re enjoying the content I produce, a little caffeine to keep me going would be appreciated!

Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash

1633561291.814079-AE25C10E-2DDE-4A25-BC90-6AF2E586F949

October 6 2021

Orthopraxy: Intercession

A. Scott Ingram Gospel Leadership, Practical Ministry Bible, Bible Study, Gospel, Holy Spirit, intercessory prayer, Jesus, Old Testament, prophetic prayer, Scripture, what is intercession 1

In the last post, we took a deep dive into corporate prayer — what it is and isn’t. We saw in that post that prayer is an essential practice for the Body of Christ to grow in. Just as God said, His household should be a “house of prayer” (Isaiah 56:7, Luke 19:46). In the New Testament, the Apostle Paul commanded that the culture of the church ought to be unceasing prayer (1 Thessalonians 5:17).

As we continue to look at prayer as a church practice, however, there is another side we must explore. There is corporate prayer, which we discussed, and of course, there is the private life of prayer for the believer (which we will not discuss much in this series.) Then, there is a middle ground, where the private prayer life of an individual believer has significant, practical implications on the public body. I am referring to what most of us would call “intercession.” To be more specific, I am talking about what many modern charismatic believers refer to as “prophetic prayer.” I believe the biblical definition points to this wording, too, as we shall soon see.

Intercession in the Old Testament

In the Old Testament, there are generally two Hebrew words translated as “intercede.” They both carry the general idea of being an arbiter or mediator, seeking to bring two parties together in agreement or reconciliation, though they each come at this purpose with a different approach. (Unfortunately, both of these words are difficult to transliterate for English readers. One is פלל or pll, and the other is פגע or pg’.)

Intercession is Based on God’s Decree

The first of these two – פלל – is a judicial word. It emphasizes making an appeal based on an objective or legal truth. Biblically speaking, this would typically be the objective truth of God’s word or a decreed judgment of God. For example, we see this word used twice in 1 Samuel 2:25:

“If someone sins against a man, God will פלל (mediate) for him, but if someone sins against the Lord, who can פלל (intercede) for him?”
^{1 Samuel 2:25}

The viability of each use of פלל in this verse is dependant on the target of a person’s sin – whether it be against man or against God. This means that the effectiveness of intercession is directly based on a preexisting determination in God’s law.

The point is that for intercession to be effective, it must rely on revealed decrees and judgments of the Lord. A person cannot simply “intercede” for anything they desire and expect to receive it. Intercession prayer must be according to His will (1 John 5:14).

Intercession is Based on Human Willingness

The second Old Testament word – פגע – emphasizes the process of meeting with a person and “pleading” with them or “entreating” them toward reconciliation. The effectiveness of this intercession has to do with a person’s willingness to be the arbiter or mediator for reconciliation. For example, Isaiah 59:16 speaks of the Lord’s wonder “that there was no one to intercede…”

In Jeremiah 27, we see a group of false prophets challenged due to their lack of intercession. God had already decreed that the Temple’s holy vessels would remain in Babylon for some time (27:22), yet these false prophets were prophesying that they would be returned shortly (27:16). Jeremiah calls them out:

“If they are prophets, and if the word of the Lord is with them, then let them intercede with the Lord of hosts, that the vessels that are left in the house of the Lord, in the house of the king of Judah, and in Jerusalem may not go to Babylon.”
^{Jeremiah 27:18}

He says, if they are prophets and have received God’s decree, then let them show a willingness to do the work of intercession in the Lord’s presence. Unfortunately, their willingness wasn’t there.

These two words show us that effective intercession always seeks reconciliation between two parties and requires two things. First, it requires the declaration of the Lord. Then, it requires the willing involvement of man to agree with God’s decree through both prayer and action.

As we will see, this same idea carried over into the New Testament as well.

Intercession in the New Testament

There are various forms of the Greek word “entynchano,” translated as “intercede” in the New Testament. Specifically, “entynchano” and “hyperentynchano.” This word means “to appeal” or “plead,” with the pleading usually done before the Lord, on behalf of someone else.

Entynchano is not pleading with people to be reconciled to God. Instead, it is pleading with God to remember His promises toward a person. (Remember, Jesus saves. It is His work, not ours.)

This form of intercession, then, is a continuation of what we saw in the Old Testament language. “Entynchano” means that we have heard the decree of God over someone or something and have the willingness to come into His presence and plead for His declaration to come to pass.

While my sovereignty-minded friends will struggle with the idea that human pleas can impact the effectiveness of God’s will, it is a very biblical idea.

Abraham Shifted God’s Plans

For one example, look at God’s declaration of judgment on Sodom in Genesis 18. Before He sent His angels to bring about destruction, God decided to hear what Abraham would say!

“The Lord said, ‘Shall I hide from Abraham what I am about to do, seeing that Abraham shall surely become a great and mighty nation, and all the nations of the earth shall be blessed in him? For I have chosen him, that he may command his children and his household after him to keep the way of the Lord by doing righteousness and justice, so that the Lord may bring to Abraham what he has promised him.'”
^{Genesis 18:17–19}

Abraham thinks through this judgment in light of the character and grace He has seen in the Lord, and He begins to bargain with Him. “God, if you find 50 righteous men in the city, will you spare it?” God relents. “40?” “30?” “20?” Again and again, God’s plans change according to the request of Abraham, until finally, they come to the final plea:

“Then he said, ‘Oh let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak again but this once. Suppose ten are found there.’ He answered, ‘For the sake of ten I will not destroy it.’ And the Lord went his way, when he had finished speaking to Abraham, and Abraham returned to his place.”
^{Genesis 18:32–33}

God had already decreed destruction, but Abraham’s intercession on behalf of the city gave an acceptable change of plans if only ten righteous might be found there. But, unfortunately, Abraham did not understand the depth of Sodom’s sinfulness before the Lord, the ten righteous were not found, and the angels destroyed the city anyways.

Moses Effectively Interceeded for Israel

We see another example of this intercession in the book of Exodus. Moses had led God’s people out of Egypt, with God working many signs and wonders along the way and giving Moses step-by-step instructions. Once the people reach Moun Sinai, God calls Moses up the mountain to receive the ten commandments. Meanwhile, the people of Israel backslide away from the Lord and begin worshipping a golden idol.

God gets very angry and decides that rather than delivering the people, He should destroy them where they stand:

“And the Lord said to Moses, ‘I have seen this people, and behold, it is a stiff-necked people. Now therefore let me alone, that my wrath may burn hot against them and I may consume them, in order that I may make a great nation of you.'”
^{Exodus 32:9–10}

Moses quickly intercedes for the people, not requesting anything based on the people’s deservedness but on God’s revealed character and plans!

“But Moses implored the Lord his God and said, ‘O Lord, why does your wrath burn hot against your people, whom you have brought out of the land of Egypt with great power and with a mighty hand? Why should the Egyptians say, ‘With evil intent did he bring them out, to kill them in the mountains and to consume them from the face of the earth’? Turn from your burning anger and relent from this disaster against your people. Remember Abraham, Isaac, and Israel, your servants, to whom you swore by your own self, and said to them, ‘I will multiply your offspring as the stars of heaven, and all this land that I have promised I will give to your offspring, and they shall inherit it forever.'”
^{Exodus 32:11–13}

Look at how Moses calls on the Lord to remember His plans as far back as Abraham and see how far they had come in His goodness. If God were to destroy the people now, it would not reflect poorly on the people. They were clearly deserving of wrath. Instead, it would appear that God’s promises are invalid. He promised to rescue a people He already knew was sinful. Now, He must uphold His decrees!

“And the Lord relented from the disaster that he had spoken of bringing on his people.”
^{Exodus 32:14}

In the next chapter, we see Moses’ intercession continue. God agreed not to destroy the people but then decided to send them on their way without Him. Moses reminds God that their identity as God’s chosen people is wrapped up in His presence with them. Again, God relents and agrees to go with Moses as He had previously promised (Exodus 33:1-5; 12-16).

God Released Wrath When There Was No Intercessor

Recalling Moses’ prayer on behalf of the people in Exodus, there is one other example of the effectiveness of intercession given in the Old Testament, which seems appropriate.

In the book of Ezekiel, God gives a long list of the sins of His people, including false prophecies and injustice to the poor. Once again, God decides He is going to bring wrath on the people. However, there is a brief pause before He does. He speaks:

“And I sought for a man among them who should build up the wall and stand in the breach before me for the land, that I should not destroy it, but I found none.”
^{Ezekiel 22:30}

God says before He brought destruction, He looked for a man who would put themselves into the gap between Him and the sinful nation to plead for grace.

The Hebrew phrase is intense. It literally means He wanted someone to “get in My face” on behalf of the land. It is the same Hebrew language used to describe Moses’ intercession in Psalm 106:23. Yet, in Ezekiel’s day, there is no one to intercede.

“Therefore I have poured out my indignation upon them. I have consumed them with the fire of my wrath. I have returned their way upon their heads, declares the Lord God.”
^{Ezekiel 22:31}

God’s Decree and Human Action in Jesus

As a final example of a life of intercession, we must look at Jesus. It was prophesied in Isaiah 53 that to fulfill God’s decree, Jesus would offer not only His prayers but also his actions as “intercession” for the lost:

“Therefore I will divide him a portion with the many, and he shall divide the spoil with the strong, because he poured out his soul to death and was numbered with the transgressors; yet he bore the sin of many, and makes intercession for the transgressors.”
^{Isaiah 53:12}

The entirety of Jesus’ life would be about reconciling the lost back to God. He would be the promised Lamb of God, who would pay the price for sin and release those who would trust Him from God’s wrath. The fulfillment of God’s promise of salvation through His sinless death in their place would be the final objective truth by which reconciliation could take place.

Based on God’s judgment which would fall on Him on the cross, the purpose of His earthly ministry, teachings, and prayer life (John 17) would be about entreating people back to God. In all ways, Jesus would be the mediator pulling both sides back toward each other (1 Timothy 2:5). This was the life of intercession.

In the same way, intercessory prayer is about partnering with God on behalf of others — the church, the lost, and the world. Intercession is not meant to be a part of the church service. Rather, intercession should be a core practice in leading the church to take its place in the ministry of reconciliation between God and man. This is the heart of the gospel and the fundamental mission of the church.

Let’s get practical.

As we can see, intercession is something much different than what takes place in our usual corporate prayer times. In corporate prayer, we join together as a body to celebrate what God is doing among us and pray with expectation for His faithfulness toward us each day. That is NOT intercession.

Intercession is where members of the body engage with the Holy Spirit to hear what is on His heart and then pray with Him to see His will come to pass. This is key. This is why I believe the definition of “prophetic prayer” is applicable.

First You Need God’s Decree

For someone to intercede, biblically, they must first hear God’s will: be it a decree, a promise, or a judgment. While this can and does take place by spending time in His written word – the Bible – those with a calling toward intercession will go deeper into specific practical matters as the Lord speaks to them (John 10:17, John 16:12-15). They need to be able to hear God’s Holy Spirit clearly.

Since intercession depends on hearing God’s voice, I find it difficult for most congregations to truly have an effective time of intercessory prayer during a regular church service. Many of the people attending do not understand what they are being asked to do. Those who do may not have the maturity to take part in biblical intercession as a brief, passing moment in a broader worship service.

For this reason, I would encourage pastors to create intercessory teams who meet at specific times outside of the regular service. They should take time together to hear from the Lord, pray into His will, and inform the leadership of what God is speaking before the regular service takes place. For some events, such as crusades or revival services, having the intercessory team in place, praying quietly throughout the service is also quite effective and strategic.

Second You Need A Willing Intercessor

This process of sitting and hearing from the Lord takes diligence and patience. Intercession, while vital to the life of the body of Christ, is not a spiritual practice everyone will engage in. This is where the willingness comes into place.

Again, this is why I believe it is a mistake for a pastor to invite every church member onto an intercessory team. It takes maturity as a believer, specifically in the area of hearing the Lord speak. For people unwilling to take the time needed to hear and pray effectively, it will be a waste of time and energy with little benefit to the church. For this same reason, there may be people who go through seasons of life where they will step on and off your intercessory team. This is ok. Just make sure that those who are there are mature, able, and willing to stand in the gap for the body and ministry.

Third You Need To Release Them With Boldness

People willing to step into the intercessor role as part of their life in the body of Christ need to be released by their leadership to follow the Holy Spirit’s leading completely. While there will definitely be times church leadership will give guidance around a specific need to pray for (an upcoming event, a needy individual, or anything else), it will ultimately be up to the Spirit in how the need is covered.

They must have the freedom and the boldness to take what they hear from the Lord and go deeper into His presence (“in My face”) with the things He shares. While the leadership can guide how some ministers in the church do their work, the intercessor cannot be directed at all times. Instead, the leadership must be willing to flow with the intercessory team as the Lord guides them along.

If we do intercession well, the church will be fruitful in the mission of reconciliation (2 Corinthians 5:18).

Let’s Connect

If you want to more than just a blog, join me on social media for more #ChristianLife and #Gospel Leadership insights throughout the week. I can be found on Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and LinkedIn, and would love to see you there.

You can also make sure to never miss any future posts by subscribing to my newsletter below. I promise never to spam your inbox or share your info with others.

If you’re enjoying the content I produce, a little caffeine to keep me going would be appreciated!

Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash

1631706557.8875852-CF458A0D-CA72-4CF4-93C4-A85E8895E64D

September 15 2021

Orthopraxy: Corporate Prayer

A. Scott Ingram Gospel Leadership, Practical Ministry Bible, Bible Study, Church, Church Ministry, church training, Gospel, Holy Spirit, Jesus, ministry leadership, ministry training, orthopraxy, Scripture 1

I grew up in the American “bible belt;” an area where there is a church building on nearly every street corner and a social expectation that you are a member of one of these churches, even if you never attend. Growing up outside of the local church, therefore, caused various relational challenges for me when people would ask the question, “where do you go to church?”

A few decades later, I now live in Uganda, where there is a similar cultural expectation of religious affiliation, though the divisions are different. Back in the U.S., the divide was denominational — baptist, methodist, pentecostal, church of Christ, etc. The religious lines here, however, are whether you are Catholic or “protestant,’ meaning Anglican (government recognized churches), a “mulokole” or “a born-again,” meaning evangelical/charismatic (not government recognized churches), or you are a Muslim.

Due to this different background, the question people ask here is also much different. Instead of being asked, “where do you go to church?” you are much more likely to hear, “where do you pray from?” While this also implies the question “which god do you pray to,” I still like this question much better. After all, as we discussed last week, the church is not a place you go; it is the community of believers with whom you gather. Prayer, however, is one of the biggest reasons why the church gathers, so the question “where do you pray from” is entirely appropriate.

As we continue our practical dive into what the church does and why, I want to dig deeper into the practice of prayer, or more specifically, “corporate prayer” as the body of Christ. Next week, we will go further into prayer by looking at the role of “intercession” as a ministry of the church.

What is Prayer?

According to the Lexham Bible Dictionary¹, prayer is “communication with God, primarily offered in the second-person voice (addressing God directly). May include petition, entreaty, supplication, thanksgiving, praise, hymns, and lament.”

From the Jewish and Christian perspective, the concept of prayer is much different from that of many other cultures. It comes down to one critical theological difference between the personality of Yahweh versus the deities of other religions. Yahweh is an intimate God who wants fellowship with His creation. Since the first man was formed in Genesis, human history has been marked by people’s relationship (or lack of relationship) with God. Relationship is one of the primary biblical characterizations that define our faith. We are the people of God because we know Him and live in relationship with Him.

Our God is a Relational God

The Bible is full of intimate and relational language when it talks about human interaction with God. For example, Moses was called a friend by God (Is. 41:8; James 2:23). The book of Hosea demonstrates God’s unfailing love for His people as a husband’s pursuit of his unfaithful bride. Jesus is called “Immanuel,” meaning God with us, and when He had to leave the earth, He sent His own Spirit to dwell inside of us. These are only a few examples, but they make the point well.

This intimate view of deities was not common in most of the pagan cultures of the first century. Instead, the gods that people worshipped were silent and distant. Prayers and offerings were made to appease them but never to know them. This is why when Paul preached to the gentiles, his gospel often emphasized the closeness of our God (Acts 17:26-28).

God is personal! Although it’s been said thousands of times before, it bears repeating: “Christianity is not a religion. It is a relationship!”

To summarize this point very candidly, to be a Christian is to know Christ. We do this first through His revelation of Himself in scripture, but we go deeper in intimacy with Him through prayer and fellowship with the Holy Spirit inside of us.

What is Corporate Prayer?

“Corporate prayer” is simply a way of saying that when we come together as a congregation (or in a small group), we are praying in unity with one another. There is cooperation in how we lift our voices to the Lord and agreement in our prayer focus.

This unified seeking of the Lord — especially for more of His presence and power in our lives — is one of the main reasons we gather as a local church. And there are several components that ought to be included when we come together in corporate prayer.

1. Worship

Though there is a strong misconception that “worship” means singing to the Lord, this is not the case. Instead, worship means recognizing and acknowledging the praiseworthiness of God, whether in song, prayer, proclamations, or deed.

Worship, therefore, should be one of the primary goals of our corporate prayer time. As we gather together, our purpose should be to behold Him and, together, publicly display our adoration of Him. That is worship.

We see worship as a vital part of prayer throughout history. Just read through the book of Psalms and see how often God’s character traits are celebrated. Also, notice how Jesus begins His model prayer by acknowledging that God’s name (character) is “hallowed” or wholly set apart, high above all other names (Matthew 6:9). (Remember, the revealed names of God represent His personal character and relational promises: Jehovah Jireh, “God who provides.” Jehovah Rapha, “God who heals.” Et al.)

If worship and adoration are not a priority in our church services, both in our singing AND in our corporate prayer, we are missing the point.

2. Thanksgiving

Whereas worship is closely related to celebrating who God is, thanksgiving celebrates all that God has done. It is gratitude for His faithfulness.

In a future post, we will see why sharing testimonies should be a regular part of our church practices to encourage others to trust the Lord more. However, as we seek to keep a record of what the Lord has done and is doing among us as the local body of Christ, we must make saying “thank You” to Him a regular practice as well.

Remember, prayer is vital for living in relationship with the Lord. It hurts His feelings when He blesses us so abundantly, but we refuse to acknowledge it through praise and thanksgiving. We must be like the Samaritan leper in Luke 17:11-19, who made the return journey to Jesus, just to say thank you. When we pray, we must take time as a body to thank Him for all that He does.

A second way we should incorporate thanksgiving into our church prayer times is to thank God for one another. We see this demonstrated in almost every pastoral letter from the Apostle Paul. He takes time, in each letter, to pray for the recipients and makes it a point to give thanks to God for individual people and their God-given gifts and roles in the church (1 Thessalonians 1:1-2; 2 Timothy 1:3; Romans 1:8; et al.). Remember, when we receive one another as a gift from God, with honor and gratitude, we will also receive the blessing from one another, as God intends (Matthew 10:41).

3. Community Petitions

Another vital element to our corporate prayers is that we should be lifting the needs of one another to the Lord.

Of course, we do this privately. Paul tells us:

“The Lord is at hand; do not be anxious about anything, but in everything by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known to God.”
^{Philippians 4:5b-6}

He also tells us to “pray without ceasing,” which implies that this is not only when we are together with the church.

However, when we walk together in unity as the body of Christ, we share in one another’s burdens (Galatians 6:2), and through our prayer, we become instruments of grace to each other. As James writes:

“And the prayer of faith will save the one who is sick, and the Lord will raise him up. And if he has committed sins, he will be forgiven. Therefore, confess your sins to one another and pray for one another, that you may be healed. The prayer of a righteous person has great power as it is working.”
^{James 5:15-16}

Therefore, it is good to give members time to make their requests known to the congregation and for the church to take time to pray specifically for those needs.

4. Blessings and Impartations

Beyond just lifting the stated needs of church members, however, our times of corporate prayer should also be opportunities to bless one another in the Lord. We should make time, as the body, to lay hands on each other, to see an impartation of God’s grace and gifts onto others; to see God’s power come alive in their lives; and to see the Holy Spirit fill them in new, fresh ways.

In the Old Testament, God commanded the Jewish priests to bless the people by putting God’s name upon them (Numbers 6:22-27). (Again, referencing God’s name implies believing in His revealed character and claiming the related promises on behalf of the person.)²

In the New Testament, we see Jesus putting a blessing onto people by embracing them (Mark 10:16), laying His hands on them, and imparting the Holy Spirit to them (John 20:22). This example was followed by the 12 Apostles (Acts 8:17) and the Apostle Paul (Acts 19:1-6).

This shared time to seek the Lord for the benefit of one another, for more of God’s presence and power in their lives, ought to be a central goal of our times in corporate prayer.

What Corporate Prayer Is Not

As you can see from the four elements we have listed above, a time of corporate prayer must be God-focused and purposeful. With that in mind, let’s take a quick look at a few things corporate prayer is not.

1. Corporate Prayer is Not Mindless

Worship, thanksgiving, petitions, and blessings all require us to pray with mindfulness. This means that when we enter into a time of corporate prayer, we must take time to explain the intended focus so that everyone is unified in seeking the Lord. It may even be necessary, at times, to give clear instructions on how to pray with or for one another.

What we never want is to say, “let’s begin to pray,” without an explicit reason. If you’re going to lead people deeper into worship through a time of prayer, or if you want to spend time praying for the empowerment of the Holy Spirit in some way, you must explain this clearly. Otherwise, you will have confusion in the prayers and declarations being made by various members of the body.

When people are home, praying in their secret place with the Lord, they should pray as the Spirit leads them. However, in corporate prayer, we must be unified in the Spirit and in agreement with one another in our requests. This unity is what will make our prayers effective.

“Again I say to you, if two of you agree on earth about anything they ask, it will be done for them by my Father in heaven. For where two or three are gathered in my name, there am I among them.”
^{Matthew 18:19-20}

2. Corporate Prayer is Not Religious Ritual

Many more traditional forms of Christianity use liturgical prayers both in and out of their services. For most of us, the best example would be the praying of “The Lord’s Prayer” when we fellowship together. For others, there are standard prayers to be prayed over various aspects of a church service or at various times and seasons of the year.

Some Catholics and traditional protestants recite prayers like the “Jesus Prayer,” which says, “Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.”

Some denominations use liturgical books, such as “The Book of Common Prayer,” used by the Anglicans, or other forms of prayer books. In fact, many of the hymnals used in many evangelical and charismatic churches contain a section of pre-written prayers to be recited, as well.

While it can be very useful to use some of these traditional prayers, which can keep us grounded in our church history and theological orthodoxy throughout the generations, we must be careful of turning corporate prayer into a weekly religious ritual we perform out of obligation.

We never want prayer to become a mindless routine or something we do simply because it is what we have always done. Even if we use some form of liturgical prayer in our services, we must do our diligence to keep the focus on Jesus and not just perform a religious exercise.

We do not pray for the sake of prayer. We pray to connect with Jesus relationally.

3. Corporate Prayer is Not Focused on the Devil

Another negative trend I have noticed often in corporate prayer is that it becomes too easy for people to take our eyes off the Lord and instead begin to engage in warfare with the devil.

Let me be clear; I do believe there is a need for spiritual warfare in the life of the church. We will cover this topic in a future post. However, the point I want to make is that we should NEVER take the time dedicated to the Lord and use it to talk to the devil. When it is time to pray, we pray to God alone. We CANNOT get distracted from Him as the central pursuit of our services!

To turn our attention to the devil when we should be in prayer actually expresses a belief that God cannot hear or answer our prayers until we get the devil out of the way. What faithlessness! Our authority over the devil comes from our relationship with Jesus! Let us never cut our intimate time with Him short to engage with an already-defeated enemy.

The Church Must Pray

Now that we have a clear understanding of what prayer is and is not, all that is left is to put it into practice. The body of Christ must pray. It should be inherent in our meetings.

As a leader, have you taught your church what prayer is and how to do it?
Do you lead your church regularly in the four elements discussed in this article?
If not, what corrections do you need to make immediately, to fulfill the biblical call to corporate prayer in your meetings?

Let’s Connect

If you want to more than just the blog, join me on social media for more #ChristianLife and #Gospel Leadership insights throughout the week. I can be found on Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and LinkedIn, and would love to see you there.

You can also make sure to never miss any future posts by subscribing to my newsletter below. I promise never to spam your inbox or share your info with others.

Endnotes:

¹ Leslie T. Hardin, “Prayer,” ed. John D. Barry et al., The Lexham Bible Dictionary (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2016).

² Joshua G. Mathews, “Blessing,” ed. Douglas Mangum et al., Lexham Theological Wordbook, Lexham Bible Reference Series (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2014).

If you’re enjoying the content I produce, a little caffeine to keep me going would be appreciated!

Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash

1631028107.9274569-E5DD654A-7D45-4442-8584-6E63AD344A23

September 7 2021

Orthopraxy: What is the Church?

A. Scott Ingram Gospel Leadership, Practical Ministry Bible, Bible Study, ekklesia, go to church, Holy Spirit, let's go to church, new testament, orthopraxy, Scripture, we are the church 0

As we dig into this series discussing how the body of Christ – “the Church” – puts their faith into practice as they meet together, the inescapable first question is, “What is the church?” That question is immediately followed by “What is the church supposed to do?” These two questions are the target of this post.

What is the Church?

The idea of “church” carries so much cultural and linguistic connotation that it has come to mean many things across the world. For hundreds of years before the Protestant Reformation, talking about “the church” always referred to the Roman Catholic church. In scholarly debate, there is always a discussion whether “the church” references the entire body of Christian believers around the world (as in Matthew 16:18) or only the local assembly of Christians in a regional area (as in John’s letters to the seven churches of Asia in Revelation 2-3). Then there is always the question of whether the word church refers to the people (i.e., “we are the church”) or the place where the people meet (i.e., “let’s go to church”).

To understand what “the church” is, we need to dive into the original language in the New Testament. We might find that the biblical understanding of “church” is quite different from what our modern vernacular would imply.

The Greek word used for “church” in the New Testament is “ekklesia.” So let’s begin by taking a deeper look into what it means.

1. An “Ekklesia” is Always the People; Never the Place

The Greek word “ekklesia” was used widely in the first century to mean an assembly of people brought together by a specific purpose. There is not a single case where the word ekklesia was used to refer to the location or building where this group met. It always meant the group itself.¹

However, confusion around this word may still remain as the word “ekklesia” is used throughout the New Testament to point to different groups of people. Thus, depending on which use is assumed, it can affect our theology.

Ekklesia is used to describe all believers everywhere in some cases (like Ephesians 1:22). At other times it is used to point to all Christians in a particular city or region (like 1 Corinthians 1:2). However, we are going to use an even narrower meaning. As we discuss “church,” we will be referring to a localized group of believers who regularly meet together for worship and service to one another (such as in Romans 16:5 or 1 Corinthians 16:19). These small, individual congregations of Christians are usually referred to as “a local church” as opposed to “the universal church” or “the American church,” etc.²

The “local church” will be our primary focus in this series because the idea of a “gathered assembly” is at the core of the word ekklesia. For us to be the church, we must meet together (Hebrews 10:24-25). It is in the gathering that our orthopraxy will be proven or not.

2. An Ekklesia Had Legislative Authority

In the New Testament times, the word ekklesia most often described a select governmental or legislative body,³ such as the Roman senate or the Jewish Sanhedrin. These assemblies would meet together to make formal decisions regarding various legal matters, whether secular or religious. These assemblies carried designated authority to rule over some domain of community life.

This governmental use of this word makes sense, then, when Jesus shares His plan to build His “ekklesia“:

“And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven”
^{Matthew 16:18}

An Embassy of Heaven

Jesus’ first stated purpose for His ekklesia was that it would move into territory ruled by sin, death, and the devil and take authority over the domain of hell (tear down their gates; their defenses). Thus, the church would have the authority to bind and loose spiritual realities in the earth. I view this in much the same way that one nation will set up an embassy in another nation to bring governmental influence over the laws and culture of the host country.

We see this legislative function further when Jesus began delegating His divine authority to His disciples.

“And he appointed twelve (whom he also named apostles) so that they might be with him and he might send them out to preach and have authority to cast out demons.”
^{Mark 3:14-15}

He gave them the title “apostles,” which, as we have discussed before, is another governmental word for a certain class of military leaders, similar to modern-day ambassadors. Their authority was to replace all of hell’s influence on earth with God’s Kingdom reality.

It is clear from these and other passages that Jesus’ “church” is an earthly delegation representing Him and carrying His legislative authority as Lord over all things.

3. An Ekklesia is a Body Formed From Shared Beliefs

The other regular use of “ekklesia” in the first century described a group of people who gathered around a shared set of beliefs or a common purpose. We read of groups such as the “ekklesia of Pythagoras” or the “ekklesia” of animals who gathered to hear Orpheus speak in the works of Himerius.⁴ This use of “ekklesia” can also be seen in the Septuagint (Greek translation of the Old Testament) when referring to gatherings of “the congregation of Israel.”⁵

Regarding the church, we can see the expectation that we, too, would be a community built around our shared faith in the gospel of Jesus Christ. We see this repeatedly as the early church leaders are commanded to teach and protect sound doctrine in the church.

“[An overseer of the church] must hold firm to the trustworthy word as taught, so that he may be able to give instruction in sound doctrine and also to rebuke those who contradict it.”
^{Titus 1:9}

“But as for you, teach what accords with sound doctrine.”
^{Titus 2:1}

“Beloved, although I was very eager to write to you about our common salvation, I found it necessary to write appealing to you to contend for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints.”
^{Jude 3}

“I appeal to you, brothers, to watch out for those who cause divisions and create obstacles contrary to the doctrine that you have been taught; avoid them. For such persons do not serve our Lord Christ, but their own appetites…”
^{Romans 16:17-18a}

A Community of Faith

We must see that the purpose of the church is to be a community of believers in Jesus Christ. This is foundational. He is the reason we are together, and together we strive to live out our shared faith in Him as the Messiah and Son of God.

Although many great civic organizations and social clubs exist that people can participate in, the church is not one. Unless you are a follower of Jesus, you cannot be a member of His ekklesia.

This fact has led to confusing and controversial situations where some groups call themselves part of Jesus’ church (universal) yet do not firmly hold to a firm faith in Christ, as revealed in the Bible. For example, the Unitarian church allows people of any religion or belief system to claim membership and does not have a common biblical doctrine as their foundation. They cannot, therefore, be considered a Christian “church” in biblical terms.

The same is true for the “Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints” (Mormons). Though they use Christian terminology, their doctrine has rejected the truth of the New Testament, and their shared faith is based on another contradictory book. Thus, though they would be considered an “ekklesia” in general terms, they are not the biblical “ekklesia of Jesus Christ.”

For a group of people to be considered “the church of Jesus Christ,” they must hold to and proclaim a biblical doctrine grounded in the Bible.

What Is the Church Supposed to Do?

Having laid the foundation for what the church is, I think we can also form a pretty clear picture of what the church is supposed to do. As we look at why believers are called together as an ekklesia – a local church assembly – we can conclude from this discussion that the following purposes should apply when a local church meets together.

1. To serve as an embassy of heaven on the earth, empowering God’s ambassadors (all believers) to bring the reality and power of God’s Kingdom to the world.

This will necessarily affect how we come together to worship, pray, and serve one another, as well as how we practice spiritual gifts, engage in spiritual warfare, and reach out to the lost around us.

2. To proclaim Christian doctrine as found in the Biblical scriptures and form a community centered around these shared beliefs.

This will lay the foundation of our life together in fellowship and will place a high demand on how we study the scriptures, preach the Word, engage in discipleship, and much more.

As we move forward in this series, we will discuss how these various practices ought to be done in order to fulfill these broader biblical mandates.

Beyond the Greek Understanding

One final note I want to make is that while it is helpful to get our foundational understanding of what “the church” is supposed to be from the language Jesus used when He established it, we must also take into consideration that the Bible is full of other commands which make Jesus’ ekklesia quite different from all other local bodies in the world. As we move forward, we will highlight many of these things, but I believe two of them are essential to note now.

The first is that Jesus repeatedly said that He is the head of the church, both universal and local. The elders and other leaders are servants under His leadership. When a human leader puts himself or herself as the highest authority in the church, it ceases to be a true church of Jesus Christ. Instead, it becomes a personality cult or a system of hierarchical domination.

Secondly, Jesus said He was sending His Holy Spirit to guide the church in all things, both doctrinally and practically. This means that we will find things particular to Jesus’ ekklesia, which may be far different from secular counterparts. We cannot and should not depend on the traditions and “best practices” of men for the direction of the church. Instead, we must always be listening to the Holy Spirit for how we “do ministry.”

This also means that as all believers have access to the same Holy Spirit, we all have a purpose and place within the life of the church and ought to have the willingness and freedom to fulfill our roles in their service to the Lord. Thus, while there will be those that God calls to places of leadership in the body, there is not a single believer who is “just a member” or is excluded from taking part in the works He has planned. If you are a believer in Jesus, you have a place. (see 1 Corinthians 12:12-26)

Let’s Connect

You can also make sure to never miss any future posts by subscribing to my newsletter below. I promise never to spam your inbox or share your info with others.

Endnotes:

¹ D. W. B. Robinson, “Church,” ed. D. R. W. Wood et al., New Bible Dictionary (Leicester, England; Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1996), 199.

² Ernest Best, “Church,” ed. Mark Allan Powell, The HarperCollins Bible Dictionary (Revised and Updated) (New York: HarperCollins, 2011), 134.

³ William Arndt et al., A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), 303.

⁴ ibid.

⁵ Paul J. Achtemeier, Harper & Row and Society of Biblical Literature, Harper’s Bible Dictionary (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1985), 168.

If you’re enjoying the content I produce, a little caffeine to keep me going would be appreciated!

Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash

1630490878.625474-6CCDF5DC-8EE0-42F2-BFC7-2473DABA60DC

September 1 2021

Orthopraxy: From Right Belief to Right Practice

A. Scott Ingram Gospel Leadership, Practical Ministry Faith, orthodoxy, orthopraxy 0

The most incredible privilege of my life is serving as the Apostolic Overseer of Sozo Ministries International, in which I get to lead, equip, and encourage a number of the most anointed men and women of God I have ever met.

I come from an American background. I was raised outside of church until I was 16, then was saved through a fundamentalist Baptist church at a youth camp. Then, after attending a fundamentalist Baptist college, I spent time working with various churches and ministries of different flavors. I served as an intern with a Baptist missionary organization for a time. I was an associate pastor at an Acts29 Network (neo-reformed) church for a few years. After that, I served an interdenominational missionary organization as an evangelist, where I traveled extensively and even lived in Haiti for almost a year. And, along the way, I grew more and more charismatic in my theological opinions before launching Sozo Ministries in 2015.

I have served in Christian ministry since 2003. In that time, I have had the privilege of working in the U.S., Mexico, Panama, Ukraine, Haiti, Israel, India, Kenya, South Sudan, and in Uganda, where I have lived full-time since 2018.

Though I have served as a youth pastor, associate pastor, cell group leader, evangelist, missionary, and probably a few other titles, my calling from the Lord is apostolic. (This is not a self-appointed role. It has been recognized by various other Christian leaders who know me well and is proven by the fruit of my labors.) My passion and anointing from the Lord are to lay the theological foundation and practical framework for building the church, especially in less-reached and unreached areas, which is where I now spend all of my time.

It is within this apostolic role that I am now setting my mind on this new blog series, which will take my writing well into next year. I am calling it “Orthopraxy,” which means taking our correct belief (orthodoxy) and letting it lead us into right action as the body of Christ.

The Basis For This Series

As God continues to open new doors for ministry and even opportunities into new nations and regions, all while the world is still in crisis with this current pandemic, it is no longer viable for me to limit my church development teachings and training to in-person settings.

As I have lived and served the body of Christ in various cultures, I have seen that there are many different ways of doing things as “the church.” This is great. There is great beauty in the diversity of God’s creation.

At the core of my belief system is that true ecclesiology is that those called by God to lead His body are not required to follow any model or method created by man. Rather, they must lead and minister out of intimacy with the Holy Spirit and only do what He leads them to do. That is how the original 12 Apostles set up the church, and it has been the way the church has taken root and grown in some of the most antithetical cultures in the world.

As I travel, I have seen this beautiful diversity in the culture of the global church, and I have observed believers everywhere doing their best to follow the Holy Spirit’s leading. Nevertheless, the fact remains that ALL Christian belief and practice must have their firm foundation on the Word of God, despite our personal cultural backgrounds or subjective experiences with the Lord.

It is here, sadly, that I have too often seen the gaps between what we claim to believe from scripture and those things we simply do out of habit or traditions of men. These are the areas I hope to shine a light on in this series.

Like What?

One example where our practices don’t always line up with scriptural teachings is the area of praise and worship. Of course, every culture has its musical styles, instruments, and methods of emotional and verbal expression, which should all be utilized to worship the Lord. However, the truth is that sometimes things get called praise or worship, which are pretty far from the biblical understanding of what those things should be.

For instance, I have heard it said that praise is when you sing upbeat songs during which people clap and dance for God, while worship is when you sing slow songs where people focus quietly on Him. That isn’t true! Also, singing songs that instruct the worshipper to dance, shout, jump, or clap, just for the sake of getting people moving, instead of pointing to the glory of God for which we ought to do those things, is too shallow to be considered praise. So we will be covering biblical praise and worship in this series.

Another example is in times of sharing testimonies. While I love hearing testimonies of God’s hand in and through His people’s lives, I can truthfully say that some things offered as testimonies are not actually shared to glorify and point people to Jesus. Some are benign, just missing the point of the opportunity. Others are outright sinful, shared with personal recognition at the heart of the story they tell.

Biblically testimonies have a prophetic power to them, which ought to lead people into more profound experience and awareness of the Lord in their lives. This will be another area we will cover in this series.

What to Expect

While I don’t want to lay out every single topic that I plan to share in this series (nor do I know them all at this point), here are some of the things to come to give you a taste of what to expect.

What is the Church?
Corporate Prayer and Intercession
Fellowship
Welcoming Visitors
Special Presentations Such as Songs or Skits
Tithes, Offerings, and Church Finances
Leading People to Salvation
Deliverance Ministry
Prophetic Protocol
Charity and Mercy Ministry
Leadership Development Within the Church
Business in Church
Politics in Church
And so much more…

I hope you will join me as we begin to dig into the practical outworkings of our shared beliefs. I plan to write in such a way that the theological foundation is laid out clearly, without giving too many specific instructions. That way, no matter your background or the culture you minister in, you will be able to take the truth of scripture and then look to the Holy Spirit yourself to discover how to put it into practice.

Let’s Connect

You can also make sure to never miss any future posts by subscribing to my newsletter below. I promise never to spam your inbox or share your info with others.

If you’re enjoying the content I produce, a little caffeine to keep me going would be appreciated!

Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash

Category: Gospel Leadership

That is not, and cannot, be considered discipleship!

Advertisement:

The first part of this mandate is: “If you abide in my word, you are truly my disciples.”

This leads to the second part of Jesus’ mandate: “and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”

Advertisement:

So what’s the point?

So what makes this different?

Advertisement:

So, what does all of this have to do with discipleship?

Advertisement:

Jump to:

Part 2: The Biblical History of Elders

The High Call of Mutual Submission

Mutual submission is a partnership of love!

Advertisement:

WHO ARE THESE “ELDERS” IN THE BIBLE?

Where Did the Idea of “Eldership” Originate?

Eldership First Developed in Families

Advertisement:

Families Became Clans, and Clans Became Nations.

As communities grew, so did the development of the eldership.

Advertisement:

Side Note: Eldership was Not an Achievement of Personal Status, but a Service to the Community

Eldership Expanded with Continued National Development

We can watch this development take place in ancient Israel.

No Longer was the Nation Only Goverend by the Presiding Patriarchs of the Family.

Advertisement:

How Did Eldership Incorporate into the Church?

Footnotes

Advertisement:

Jump to:

Part 1: What Does “Submission” Mean?

Advertisement:

The most common word for “submit” is ὑποτάσσω (hypotassō).

We First Submit to God

There is a Submission within Families

We Submit to Governmental Authority

We Submit to the Church

Mutual Submission Between Fellow Believers:

Submission to Our Predecessors/Forerunners in Christ:

Mutual Submission Between Fellow Ministers:

Submission to “Elders:”

Advertisement:

There is another word in the Bible that some translators use as “submit.” It is the Greek word εἴκω (eikō) or ὑπείκω (hypeikō).

Who are these leaders?

The only other biblical example of this word for “yielding” or “submission” is in Galatians 2:4-5 wherein Paul recounts his first public visit to Jerusalem:

There is one other Greek word for which English translations use the word “Submit”: δογματίζω (dogmatizō).2

The only example of this word in scripture is found in Colossians 2:20-21:

Advertisement:

Let’s Get Practical

1. Does the person hold to and teach true biblical doctrine?

2. Does this person’s reputation as a Christian, their faithfulness to Jesus, and their maturity as a disciple make them credible as a mentor in the faith?

3. Does this person have delegated authority from God within the church that I am biblically mandated to submit to (hypotassō)?

And just as importantly, has the local body of Christ been persuaded (hypeikō) that this person carries the gifts and callings of God, which grants them the reputation to be a church leader?

In Conclusion

We should never submit to “one person” as our sole spiritual authority. That is dangerous!

Christians Must Seek Out Quality Mentors from within the Body of Christ

We must determine which church leaders God has ordained us to follow.

Footnotes:

Advertisement:

Disclaimer

Advertisement:

Statement: “Christians Must Submit to Their Pastor.”

But first…

I would like to hear from you.

Please let me know in the comments.

Current Trends

What Does the Bible Say?

The Church is Commanded to Show Hospitality

Church Leaders are Commanded to Value Outsiders

Let’s Get Practical

1. Jesus Must Be the Focus

2. Visitors Are Guests of Jesus

It’s All About Jesus. Seek Him and Follow His Lead.

Let’s Connect

Endnotes

What is Fellowship

Can Friendship Be Forced?

The Foundation of Fellowship

There is one other Greek word for which English translations use the word “Submit”: δογματίζω (dogmatizō).²